← Back to team overview

lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

Re: Prepping for the last upgrade test

 

All the alternates have been respun and marked as ready for release,
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/daily/current/saucy-alternate-i386.list etc.
shows that they contain the correct kernel. The bug has been marked fix
released and is now not mentioned in the release notes at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SaucySalamander/Alpha2/Lubuntu

Regards,

Phill.

On 25 July 2013 12:52, Nio Wiklund <nio.wiklund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thank you Phill,
>
> I'm looking forward to the second re-spin :-)
>
> Best regards
> Nio
>
> On 2013-07-25 13:42, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > well spotted, for some reason the alternates did not get the 2nd respin
> > when the kernel changed. This is being done now. All the test results
> > will stand and the gremlin mentioned in the -4 kernel will not be
> > mentioned in the release notes :)
> >
> > Thanks for all the work on this one!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Phill.
> >
> > On 25 July 2013 11:56, Nio Wiklund <nio.wiklund@xxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:nio.wiklund@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> >     I suggest a respin of the 32-bit alternate iso changing the kernel
> from
> >     3.10.0-4 to 3.10.0-5, which would solve several problems, maybe even
> >     your show stopper, Lance.
> >
> >     If too late for the Alpha 2, I'm eagerly awaiting the next daily
> build.
> >
> >     Best regards
> >     Nio
> >
> >     On 2013-07-25 12:25, Lance wrote:
> >     > It seems that this is going to take some time to resolve :^)
> >     >
> >     > We always mention in the release notes that "this is an alpha so
> >     expect
> >     > bugs".
> >     >
> >     > ATM I sort of think this time we should say something like:
> >     >
> >     > "Due to recent kernel and xorg changes we know that the alpha 2
> images
> >     > are finicky (could use the word "problematic") with some hardware.
> >     We're
> >     > continuing to look into this issue, but if you can't boot the live
> >     image
> >     > to a working DE we recommend not installing this alpha 2 image".
> >     >
> >     > That's a rough draft.
> >     >
> >     > What do you all think?
> >     >
> >     > Lance
> >     >
> >     >
> >     >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     > *From:* Nio Wiklund <nio.wiklund@xxxxxxxxx
> >     <mailto:nio.wiklund@xxxxxxxxx>>
> >     > *To:* Lance <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx>>
> >     > *Cc:* Jonathan Marsden <jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >     <mailto:jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx>>; Phill Whiteside
> >     > <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>; lubuntu-qa <lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >     <mailto:lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>; Lars
> >     > Noodén <lars.nooden@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:lars.nooden@xxxxxxxxx>>
> >     > *Sent:* Thursday, July 25, 2013 4:35 AM
> >     > *Subject:* Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Prepping for the last upgrade test
> >     >
> >     > I'm glad you can install the server Lance.
> >     >
> >     > I guess you mean that it works in your VIA computer. One more
> >     thing that
> >     > works :-)
> >     >
> >     > And yes, we might have different problems. Phill and I might also
> have
> >     > different problems ... or two or three of us have the same problem.
> >     >
> >     > Could it be that some package comes as a different version from
> >     the iso
> >     > compared to via the network? So that we share the problem with
> Lars? I
> >     > think this is the case with the kernel (which makes a difference
> with
> >     > zRAM). Could there be some other package too?
> >     >
> >     > Best regards
> >     > Nio
> >     >
> >     > On 2013-07-25 10:59, Lance wrote:
> >     >> The server image worked OK so it's likely an Xorg bug.
> >     >>
> >     >> But Nio is having trouble too:
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1203852
> >     >>
> >     >> I sort of think that we're having two different problems but I'm
> >     not sure.
> >     >>
> >     >> Lance
> >     >>
> >     >> PS: sorry for the top posting but I have a hardware mess right
> now so
> >     >> I'm just "getting by" :^(
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     >> *From:* Lance <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx>
> >     <mailto:lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx>>>
> >     >> *To:* Jonathan Marsden <jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >     <mailto:jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     > <mailto:jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>;
> >     Phill Whiteside
> >     >> <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx
> >     <mailto:PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>>>
> >     >> *Cc:* lubuntu-qa <lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >     <mailto:lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     > <mailto:lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >     <mailto:lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
> >     >> *Sent:* Thursday, July 25, 2013 2:54 AM
> >     >> *Subject:* Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Prepping for the last upgrade test
> >     >>
> >     >> I'd never tried a server daily image.
> >     >>
> >     >> For that matter I haven't installed a server image since maybe
> >     2007 :^(
> >     >>
> >     >> So far I've tried the Xubuntu Alpha 2 image and I know it fails
> too.
> >     >>
> >     >> I have also captured some screenshots with my camera, but this
> >     may take
> >     >> a while.
> >     >>
> >     >> Anyway I'm trying this server image now:
> >     >>
> >     >> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily/pending/
> >     >>
> >     >> It shows last updated 07/25 so I'll see what happens.
> >     >>
> >     >> Lance
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >     >>
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     >> *From:* Jonathan Marsden <jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >     <mailto:jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     > <mailto:jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
> >     >> *To:* Lance <lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx>
> >     <mailto:lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:lbsolost@xxxxxxxxx>>>; Phill
> >     > Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx
> >     <mailto:PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>>>
> >     >> *Cc:* lubuntu-qa <lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >     <mailto:lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     > <mailto:lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >     <mailto:lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
> >     >> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 24, 2013 7:11 PM
> >     >> *Subject:* Re: [Lubuntu-qa] Prepping for the last upgrade test
> >     >>
> >     >> Lance,
> >     >>
> >     >> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013, at 11:50 AM, Lance wrote:
> >     >>
> >     >>> So, I need to figure out if it's the kernel or X
> >     ................... that
> >     >>> could take a while.
> >     >>
> >     >> Boot and install Ubuntu Server.  If that works, the kernel is OK
> :)
> >     >>
> >     >> You could also use the mini.iso if you prefer.
> >     >>
> >     >> Jonathan
> >     >> --
> >     >>  Jonathan Marsden
> >     >>  jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     <mailto:jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> >     > <mailto:jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     <mailto:jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>
> >     >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
>


-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw

Follow ups

References