lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive
-
lubuntu-qa team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03850
Re: Saucy Final Desktop iso's disabled
All the alternates have just been respun. I've no particular idea why, but
am surmising it is because of the server respins. I'll do the amd64 and
i386 ones.
Regards,
Phill.
On 16 October 2013 17:19, Nio Wiklund <nio.wiklund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> OK
>
> On 2013-10-16 18:17, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> > The fixes coming in are going to be for ubiquity, specifically the
> > partitioning part of it. So, provided you can do the installs as per the
> > test cases, it will be okay. I'm not sure when the next re-spins of DE
> > will arrive, I don't know if they're holding some of them back so as to
> > attempt one final set of fixes in stead of mutliple re-spins.
> >
> > The good news? All our Alternates seem healthy enough :)
> >
> > The 1st set of DE respins have arrived, so now is a good time to zsync
> > up your ISO's so we can keep on top of them! Then try a side-by-side
> > install. This seems to be the one causing most grief.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Phill.
> >
> >
> > On 16 October 2013 17:07, Nio Wiklund <nio.wiklund@xxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:nio.wiklund@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > Does this mean there will be at least one more respin?
> >
> > And should we focus on some particular features when testing the
> desktop
> > isos?
> >
> > Best regards
> > Nio
> >
> > On 2013-10-16 17:47, Phill Whiteside wrote:
> > > It never rains, but it
> > > pours....
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1240532 has
> > > just arrived.... So, don't hold your breath fro re-spins whilst
> > they get
> > > the issues sorted out!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Phill.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 16 October 2013 16:30, Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > <mailto:PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > an update.. there will be a further re-spin of the DE ISO's.
> > The one
> > > currently being carried out is not for that bug. The next
> re-spin
> > > will be! Meanwhile, I've nearly finished the alternates and
> > will be
> > > able to also "dive in" for the DE's (provided they don't
> > rebuild the
> > > alternates for some other reason :P )
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Phill.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 16 October 2013 16:08, JM <meets@xxxxxx
> > <mailto:meets@xxxxxx> <mailto:meets@xxxxxx <mailto:meets@xxxxxx>>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:34:18 +0100
> > > Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > > It does indeed seem it is that bug. Here's how the
> > lubuntu one
> > > should look
> > > > when it's re spun.
> > > >
> > >
> > https://launchpadlibrarian.net/153861844/lubuntu-new-dividors.pngI'm
> > > sure
> > > > everyone does agree that from just a support side of
> things,
> > > having this
> > > > bug fixed - even this late in the day; is well worth the
> > > efforts needed to
> > > > test once the iso's have been re-spun.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Yes it is worth the efforts. As I said in the feedback
> after I
> > > installed a destkop
> > > version, on one whole hard drive which is besides another
> one
> > > containing several distros,
> > > (one plugged with SATA and one with IDE) this part only
> > showed a
> > > blank space on each side
> > > and I was unable to perform any re-size.
> > >
> > > Looking forward to the next desktop ISO.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Mélodie
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>
>
--
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
Follow ups
References
