p2psp team mailing list archive

[Ilshat Shakirov <im.shakirov@xxxxxxxxx>]

>
> Malicious peers will be smart and they can perform different types of
> attacks.
> Keep in main that the goal  is to check the efficiency of  STrPe and
> STrPe-DS against those type of attacks.

The first step is to implement STrPe. I think that the malicious peer which
will just send poisoned chunk (000..00) is enough for evaluating STrPe. (am
I right?)

We have to agree about what experiments (number of malicious peers, type of
> attacks, etc) are needed to check the results and your code.
>
It's ok. I will prepare plan asap.

It is rare the system go down for 5-10 sec. What is the environment you are
> checking it?
>
MacOS (yosemite); I run splitter, monitor and peer. When system is going to
down, the vlc out the error messages like *can't decode timestamp.
But it occurs from time to time, ie today morning all was ok =) And I just
check it again, all was ok.

Thanks!

2015-05-25 12:39 GMT+05:00 L.G.Casado <leo@xxxxxx>:

>  Dear all, mostly Ilshat,
>
> Following your proposal, please take into account the paper we sent to you.
> Malicious peers will be smart and they can perform different types of
> attacks.
>
> Keep in main that the goal  is to check the efficiency of  STrPe and
> STrPe-DS against those type of attacks.
> We have to agree about what experiments (number of malicious peers, type
> of attacks, etc) are needed to check the results and your code.
> It is rare the system go down for 5-10 sec. What is the environment you
> are checking it?
>
> Best,
>
> Leo
>
>
> El lun, 25-05-2015 a las 10:00 +0500, Ilshat Shakirov escribió:
>
> Hello!,
>
>  Would you mind writting a brief description of what you've done to the
> date so we can see in which direction to go from here?
>
>  Ok, but I am really did nothing serious. I have just implemented the
> malicious peer (the same way as lossy peer, I have replaced team_socket in
> peer). Now I am testing it, but I have some issues with local team (the
> monitor peer plays stream normally for first 5-10 secs, and then there are
> lost chunks and stream begins to freeze, and etc.; it's happening without
> malicious peer =)).
>
>
>  I want to do things in the same order as it described in my proposal
> <http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/student/google/gsoc2015/dshaman92/5629499534213120>.
> Is it right?
>
>
>  You can see my progress in github <https://github.com/ishakirov/p2psp>;
> Im working with fork of p2psp; Im using git-flow, so I develop new feature
> in new branch and then merge master and new-feature-branch. Also I will
> report my progress in blog <http://shakirov-dev.blogspot.ru/>, I will try
> to do it every Sunday.
>
>
>  2015-05-25 0:00 GMT+05:00 Juan Álvaro Muñoz Naranjo <
> juanalvaro83@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>  Hi Ilshat,
>
>
>   thanks to you for taking this project. As you know the GSoC officially
> starts tomorrow (Monday). Would you mind writting a brief description of
> what you've done to the date so we can see in which direction to go from
> here?
>
>
>   Thanks,
>
>
>   Juan
>
>
>   2015-05-24 1:12 GMT+02:00 Cristóbal Medina López <
> cristobalmedinalopez@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>   Hi Ilshat,
>
>
>    El sáb., 23 may. 2015 a las 19:14, Ilshat Shakirov (<
> im.shakirov@xxxxxxxxx>) escribió:
>
>    Hello!,
>
>
>     Sorry for the delay in the response and many thanks for accepting my
> project =)
>
>
>
>
>    No problem, in fact, the GSoC starts officially the next monday :-)
>
>
>
>
>     Currently, I am experimenting with malicious peer (here is my variant
> of malicious peer:
> https://github.com/P2PSP/p2psp/compare/master...ishakirov:malicious_peer).
>
>     Is it right way to implement malicious peer? I have changed the
> peer.py and peer_dbs.py files (added new constant, and added condition for
> the sending chunks to other peers). Also, I see the lossy socket
> implementation, may be I must do smth like this?
>
>
>
>    The idea is to use import from other class and overwrite the method if
> necessary. You can see an example in the lossy_peer.py file. In fact, each
> set of rules use an import class from another one. You can take a look in
> the current sets of rules implemented in order to understand it.
>
>
>
>
>
>     Also, I am experiencing some problems with public splitter
> (150.214.150.68). There is lost chunks and 4 banned peers. May be it is
> consequence of my experiments,
>
>
>
>    There is a monitor peer in the same host that the splitter. So the
> splitter should expel to the "banned peers" due to the claims of the
> monitor peer.
>
>
>
>    but I dont know exactly, so I need some help.
>
>
>
>    You can experiment running a team in localhost.
>
>
>
>
>
>     Thanks in advance!
>
>
>
>    Regards!
>
>
>
>
>     --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~p2psp
> Post to     : p2psp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~p2psp
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
>
>
>
>