p2psp team mailing list archive

["L.G.Casado" <leo@xxxxxx>]

Dear all,
El lun, 25-05-2015 a las 14:13 +0500, Ilshat Shakirov escribió:
>         Malicious peers will be smart and they can perform different
>         types of attacks.
>         Keep in main that the goal  is to check the efficiency of
>         STrPe and STrPe-DS against those type of attacks.
>         
> The first step is to implement STrPe. I think that the malicious peer
> which will just send poisoned chunk (000..00) is enough for evaluating
> STrPe. (am I right?)

Yes, that's the first step, sending poisoned chunk to the rest. But
malicious peer is supposed to be smart, trying to avoid policies or
colluding with others...
In any case, STrPe-DS is more interesting in a real scenario.

> 
> 
>         We have to agree about what experiments (number of malicious
>         peers, type of attacks, etc) are needed to check the results
>         and your code.
>         
> It's ok. I will prepare plan asap.

Thanks.


>         It is rare the system go down for 5-10 sec. What is the
>         environment you are checking it?   
>         
> MacOS (yosemite); I run splitter, monitor and peer. When system is
> going to down, the vlc out the error messages like *can't decode
> timestamp.
> But it occurs from time to time, ie today morning all was ok =) And I
> just check it again, all was ok. 

I use Linux.

Best,

Leo