ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[Brian Murray <brian@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 10:56:55AM -0500, HggdH wrote:
> 
> 
> > > > After the application is received two or three positive endorsements of
> > > > the applicant will be required for their approval in the team.
> > > 
> > > Yes a vote of majority is enough there (being 2 votes now).
> > 
> > A majority of what?  The Bug Control team has about 100 members at the
> > moment.
> 
> I think Pedro was referring to the current three administrators for the
> bug-control, and he did not realise you were proposing "power to the
> people".
> 
> I would like to propose a slightly different approach: 
> 
> * any three can approve, but bug-control administrators have veto power.
> .
> * bug-control decisions are final (but subject to explanation if
> requested).
> 
> >  
> > > > Additionally, the review process should be limited to a one week
> > > > (calendar) period after the application has posted to the mailing list.
> 
> What happens after one week of no response? Approval by fiat? Or should
> bug-control administration act?

I think a member of Ubuntu Bug Control administration should be required
to review the application on the 8th day and approve or deny the
application.  This responsibility could rotate around the team's
administrators.

-- 
Brian Murray                                                 @ubuntu.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature