ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-bugcontrol team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00265
Re: Application for Bug Control membership
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 02:48:50PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 02:27:32PM -0700, Brian Murray wrote:
> > On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 02:52:56PM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > > I'd like to give Geir my strong +1 for membership in Bug Control.
> > > He has shown an impressive level of dedication and patience in dealing
> > > with the influx of -intel bugs that we see.
> > >
> > > Since we get so many bugs filed against X, a lot of the basic triage
> > > work is automated. Geir has been instrumental at the more advanced
> > > level that really requires human intervention, patiently helping
> > > frustrated bug reporters through tricky situations to gather the
> > > necessary information, and in numerous cases helping guide the bug
> > > towards a solution. He has also taken an active role in establishing a
> > > team-wide standardization of tags for X bugs to facilitate finding dupes
> > > (http://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Tagging).
> >
> > Would it be useful to have these be incorporated in the lp_buttontags
> > greasemonkey script?
>
> Sure, although personally I use launchpadlib scripts for setting tags
> these days. Probably it would make sense to port lp_buttontags to use
> launchpadlib.
I think I'm missing something here how would porting it to launchpadlib
help? I think the advantage of the greasemonkey scripts is that it
presents everything right there in your web browser and acts as a
reminder of the commonly used tags to without having to load a wiki
page.
I think there is value in using launchpadlib for complex operations but
not for just adding tags.
--
Brian Murray @ubuntu.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Follow ups
References