ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[Chad Miller <chad.miller@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Did this go anywhere? Who resolves this? - c


On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Thomas Ward <teward@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Chad Miller <chad.miller@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Matthew Fischer
> > <matthew.fischer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm generally +1 as well since I've also worked with Chad before, but
> Chad
> >> can you please list the severity you would assign the rest of those
> issues
> >> and why?
> >
> >
> > Sure.
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/902747
> > Triaged/Low.  Not enough memory to start up is also not enough memory to
> > run. A nicer crash dialog is all we can hope for.  Shoudn't affect many
> > people.
> >
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1226618
> > Incomplete/Undecided for now.  On reply, either Invalid or Triaged/High
> and
> > tag "refression-update". Opening links from outside it is fundamental.
> \>
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/1229065
> > On c-b, Triaged/Medium or Invalid. Big impact, noncore plugin.  Maybe
> > Invalid for c-b when we have more information.
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1225215
> > Triaged/High. Medium impact on many users.
>
> I'm disagreeing with your assessment here on this bug.  Ignoring the
> fact that this bug was filed by you, Chad, the reason for my
> disagreeing is because this bug is missing key information that
> myself, as a triager, would want to see in order to confirm the bug.
> Specifically, the version of Ubuntu affected and the version of
> Chromium affected.  Without those two bits of information, triagers
> would need to test every currently-supported version of Ubuntu and
> chromium-browser to narrow down which versions of Ubuntu are affected,
> and not every triager has every version of Ubuntu at their beck and
> call.
>
> And I am making a point of this, because, under the LTS (12.04) I run
> CPU intense programs routinely, and even when all available CPU power
> is pumped into things, and I start chromium-browser, I cannot
> replicate this bug.  Sure, it loads a bit slower because all the CPU
> power is being utilized for other things, but I can't specifically
> replicate this bug.  Version details are missing, and that's all that
> I'd need to see to be able to continue to test/triage that bug, or at
> the very least confirm the bug exists.  (I would probably set this as
> Incomplete/Undecided until that information was provided, especially
> since I can't replicate this on 12.04 so there may be a
> version-specific issue here.)
>
> >
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin/+bug/1228417
> > On a-f, New/Undecided. probably High.  Segv 5 frames deep in proprietary
> > code.
> >
> >--------------------
>
> Other than the issues with that 4th bug, I don't see any other issues
> with your assessment on those other bugs.  +1 from me, based on the
> other 4 bugs.
>
> ------
> Thomas Ward
> https://launchpad.net/~teward
>