On 11/15/2011 06:38 AM, Pedro Villavicencio wrote:
Hello,
El 14/11/11 17:14, Kate Stewart escribió:
Ursula, Pedro, Joseph, Jose,
I'm doing a pass through the escalated and "needs to be" escalated
bugs right now, and want to make sure there are no others from the
defect analysts that should be considered. Here's what I have so far
>from the defect analysts needs. (thanks Brian!). Anything other bugs
on each of your top "need a fix to this launchpad bug to make my life a
bit more sane list?" or does the list Brian provided hit your top ones
as well?
The list provided by Brian does represent my concerns too, I'm
particular interesting on the last two there: LP: #29713 and LP: #878532.
Thanks!,
pedro.
Currently escalated bugs, and those that are being considered to be
escalated can be found here:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Launchpad/Stakeholder/UbuntuEngineering
Thanks,
Kate
I'm still getting up to speed with the good and bad of Launchpad, so
I don't have any top bugs as of yet.
However, one thing I noticed is Launchpad does not provide the
option to search for tags using wild cards. There are ways around
this using the Launchpad API. However, it would be nice to be able
to use wild cards.
When a kernel bug is fixed upstream, we mark it with a tag like:
'kernel-fixed-upstream-KERNEL-VERSION'. For example, if kernel
version 3.2-rc1 fixed a bug, the tag would be:
'kernel-fixed-upstream-v3.2-rc1'. However, another bug might be
fixed by 3.2-rc2, so the tag would be
'kernel-fixed-upstream-v3.2-rc2'. It would be great if we could
search bugs with tags 'kernel-fixed-upstream-v3.2*' or
'kernel-fixed-upstream-v3.1*'
Do you all consider the lack of wild cards a bug? If so, I will open one.
