ubuntu-manual team mailing list archive

[Jason Cook <jason@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I defiantly agree that the *primary* development should be done on the web
based content, *but* there should be a way to have the
docs available offline. The way I recommended would work well, but would be
*very* difficult.

On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Kyle Nitzsche
<kyle.nitzsche@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> Hi Jason,
>
> On 07/09/2010 04:08 PM, Jason Cook wrote:
>
>> The inclusion of on-disk documentation should be up to the user and be
>> "package-wide". Having a "documentation" package that has the documentation
>> for all installed applications. The way this would work (at least in theory)
>> is:
>>
>>    * on instalation of this package
>>          o finds all installed packages
>>          o check for documentation
>>          o download documentation
>>
>>    * on installation of new package(s)
>>          o find newly installed packages
>>          o download new documentation
>>    * on removal of package
>>          o remove install documentation
>>
>>
>> Being done this way allows the user to choose weather documentation is
>> installed by default and conserves disk space by only having the
>> documentation for installed application.This would also eliminate the need
>> to install a separate package (such as openshot-docs) for documentation, it
>> would be added automatically.
>>
>>  That's a reasonable amount of infrastructure development in order to
> support downloadable, translated docs with the primary goal of supporting
> the use case of a user who is not connected to the internet. Yet, it assumes
> they do have an internet connection at other times (in order to download the
> docs). While it is possible, I tend to think a more strategic direction is
> increasingly more web based help with increasingly less on-disk help.
>
> Cheers,
> Kyle
>
>> Jason Cook
>>
>
>
>


-- 
Jason Cook