← Back to team overview

ufl team mailing list archive

Re: [HG UFL] Fixed lhs/rhs bug, turns out it was in the list_tensor handler.

 

On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 04:13:10PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 03:10:03PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote:
> >
> >
> > Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Garth N. Wells <gnw20@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> > >>> Quoting Harish Narayanan <harish.mlists@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Garth N. Wells wrote:
> > >>>>> Harish Narayanan wrote:
> > >>>>>> Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> > >>>>>>> I fixed _something_...
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Now I'm getting:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Visiting Zero: Zero((), (), {})
> > >>>>>>> Zero is not supported (yet).
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> *** FFC: Zero is not supported (yet).
> > >>>>>>> *** FFC: To get more information about this error, rerun FFC with
> > >>>>>>> --debug.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> And sfc fails to compile the form for some other reason.
> > >>>>>> I am just writing to note that the original form I was trying to compile
> > >>>>>> where I noticed this error (it was not a system) is now working.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>> What's the status of this? Is it critical enough to hold up a release
> > >>>>> (more to the point, a release of all the other FEniCS components which
> > >>>>> is long overdue)?
> > >>>> I just checked this and the case that Martin mentioned (which has a zero
> > >>>> rhs) still doesn't work.
> > >>> I wouldn't call this a bug, it's just a missing implementation. We have a ton of
> > >>> other things that are not implemented/supported yet, so if we have to wait for
> > >>> all that, the release will never happen.
> > >>> At least it crashes with a sensible error message.
> > >>>
> > >> OK. So unless someone is working on resolving it imminently. I suggest
> > >> that we move forward with a release.
> > >>
> > >> Garth
> > >
> > > I concur.
> > >
> >
> > OK! Anders, can you make the release of UFL? Then the rest can follow.
> 
> Yes, I just want the buildbot to be green first. It's currently
> failing because of the update to UFL which results in different
> signatures and different code for some of the demos.
> 
> I'll check that and then release UFL, UFC, FFC.

I've done UFL and UFC. Will release FFC when we've fixed the bug for
the Windows buildbot. It's not very important but it's nice to do it
before the release since we are going to update the references.

-- 
Anders

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


References