unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00453
Re: Updates on Login
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:55 PM, mac_v <drkvi-a@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why do they have to wait! there is no need , it is just
> install+shutdown! User just selected install and shutdown!
> We Just Make sure we send proper updates. Also... we can set rules that
> if the shutdown stalls for x mins , cause a forced shutdown.
Leaving the computer while it's still working is *very* likely to cause a
sense of discomfort, and chances are people will stick around and wait for
it to finish.
> But users *has to wait for the updates at login* .
Yes, but because they're starting their computer they're not trying to go
somewhere else. See the difference? When they're shutting down they're
trying to leave; by trying to do more after they've said stop, we're
delaying them from moving on.
> As ScottK has said , there are policies in place which ensure updates
> dont break stable releases. Most of the problems occur for us during the
> alpha and beta releases.
I'm not concerned with breakage from updates, that's another issue. debconf
isn't from breakage.
Average users use the computers at any time they want. Not everyone
> wants to wait for updates to get to their work [or] hungover every time
> they start their machine...
I don't know why you think I'm only looking at one use case. I'm not really
focused on any particular use scenario. You're right not everyone wants to
wait for their updates to get started, but before you start is a better time
to wait than after you finish and want to leave.
Same way, most people wont mind spending the extra 45sec at the end of
> work.
> How many times have you stretched/relax just after finishing work?
> So many times you hear people saying "just give me a sec, let me stretch
> out, before i head out"
> Not everyone is in a hurry to run away from their system/office.
>
> It is more often you see people relaxing just after work and spending
> some time chatting with the co-workers before they head out. Even if
> they are waiting , a 45secs while they are chatting doesnt matter.
Sure, but what if the update takes 10 minutes? Having to wait to leave is so
much worse than having to wait to get started because of the fact that's
been stated in this thread multiple times about the nature of each action.
Before you start you have time. You're about to sit down, you haven't
started anything, and a reboot is not going to affect your work. If at
shutdown you have to wait, now the computer is keeping you at it when you
need to leave. This is not good.
> Thats is exactly why there are problems with login updates.! It always
> needs a reboot! atleast until something comes up where we dont start the
> kernel.
>
Really we need to get away from the issue that rebooting is a problem. It's
not. The problem is destroying the user's mental context.
> finally ! That is what *we have to focus on Minimizing Disruptions* ,
> the user shouldnt even realize they are updating. we should Only focus
> on least intrusion methods.
I don't agree with this. Upgrading is an important part of using your system
and we need to make sure they get done, but we need to do so in as
non-obtrusive a way as possible. This doesn't mean sneaking them im, it
means finding the right time and right way to present the user with the fact
that they're available, and need installed.
You are forgetting something>
> *we are not designing Ubuntu Only for the people on this list* , Ubuntu
> is used more on Desktops than laptop on the whole, that is what we have
> to design not based our personal experiences , but for the Average users.
> Your assumption that only corporate environment uses desktop is wrong.
> How many laptops are sold/used in comparison to desktops?
>
I'm not forgetting anything, I know who we're designing Ubuntu for. If you
think that laptops aren't a primary use case, you're severely out of touch.
Google around, laptop sales are much higher than desktop sales, and this
trend does not seem to be going away any time soon.
--
-- Alex Launi
Follow ups
References
-
Updates on Login (was: Re: [Fwd: Update manager])
From: Alex Launi, 2009-06-16
-
Re: Updates on Login
From: mac_v, 2009-06-16
-
Re: Updates on Login
From: Alex Launi, 2009-06-16
-
Re: Updates on Login
From: David Siegel, 2009-06-17
-
Re: Updates on Login
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2009-07-04
-
Re: Updates on Login
From: Alex Launi, 2009-07-06
-
Re: Updates on Login
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2009-07-06
-
Re: Updates on Login
From: David Siegel, 2009-07-07
-
Re: Updates on Login
From: Alex Launi, 2009-07-07
-
Re: Updates on Login
From: mac_v, 2009-07-07