unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02319
Re: No "application bucket" needed
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:12, David Hamm <davidthamm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As for Rhythmbox sharing files it seems that they are just files after
> all and rather this shouldn't be handled by Rhythmbox. Unless
> Rhythmbox is acting like a controller.
>
Rhythmbox plugins can mean lots of things. One is the LIRC plugin. If that
plugin is loaded and working right, and I use my remote control to "Unpause"
rhythmbox, it should start playing again, regardless of whether the window
is open or closed, and regardless of whether Rhythmbox was playing or paused
when the window's state last changed.
There's also DAAP, which is a plugin to stream music on demand to other
instances (not quite just file sharing)
--
Jeremy Nickurak -= Email/XMPP: jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxx =-
References
-
Windicators
From: Roth Robert, 2010-05-03
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: David Hamm, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Dylan McCall, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Sense Hofstede, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: David Hamm, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Jeremy Nickurak, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: David Hamm, 2010-05-19