unity-design team mailing list archive
-
unity-design team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02320
Re: No "application bucket" needed
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:20, Mark Shuttleworth <mark@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> No. People understand logout and login to be a reset, and I think we mess
> with that at our peril.
>
There's an argument that people use close and restart as an "application
restart". That can be invalidated (i think) by having a clear visual
indication that the the window is tied to the indicator, and the
"application" really lives in the indicator, and that the window is just an
interface to it.
--
Jeremy Nickurak -= Email/XMPP: jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxx =-
References
-
Windicators
From: Roth Robert, 2010-05-03
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Dylan McCall, 2010-05-18
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Sense Hofstede, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: David Hamm, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Jeremy Nickurak, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Jeremy Nickurak, 2010-05-19
-
Re: No "application bucket" needed
From: Mark Shuttleworth, 2010-05-19