On 15 July 2010 21:00, chiara modenese <c.modenese@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:c.modenese@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
This is because ScGeom algorithms don't need total strain (*). (*)
One exception : HertzMindlin, thats why I suggested deriving it
from Dem3Dof rather than ScGeom.
Hi guys, perhaps I am escaping something. Why would HM need total
strain? As it is now it is incremental, same way as computed in PFC.
Anyway, PFC or not I have been studying Mindlin's paper and I plan
to code the exact formulation in the future. And again it is all
incremental. So no problem on my side with the current design.
One more note. Even if ScGeom is using the incremental formulation, it
is always possible to calculate the total shear elastic, and
eventually also plastic, displacement. It can be done, incrementally,
in Law2 if needed. Same way we get the shear force. What is the
problem with that?
Chiara
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
Post to : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ce message entrant est certifié sans virus connu
Analyse effectuée par AVG - www.avg.fr
Version: 9.0.839 / Base de données virale: 271.1.1/3007 - Date: 07/15/10 13:09:00