yade-dev team mailing list archive

[chiara modenese <c.modenese@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 15 July 2010 21:27, Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> You said once that you were using updateShear=true. It was actually the
> only reason to keep shear and updateShear in this WT* 2365 commit. ;-)
>
Oh sorry, maybe I said I was testing it because I wanted to know if it was
giving the right result. You can get rid of it. ATM the only place where I
see that function in use is the ElasticContactLaw. Anyway it is a repetition
of what could be done with rotate() function and shearIncrement() functions
(I hope you will manage to replace them in ScGeom as it looked good choice
to me).


>
> If somebody need it again, he can derive an Ig containing shear, and update
> it with ScGeom::rotate(shear), as you say.

Yes, sure.
Bye. Chiara