yade-dev team mailing list archive
-
yade-dev team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #06926
Re: periodic boundary consolidation
> Only one change not mentioned in previous mail: setting Hsize is _not_
> updating trsf (I added trsf=Id in setBox, it is effectively not modified).
> That way, all cross-dependences between trsf, H, refH are removed and
> everything is more clear I think.
>
> formulation.rst is updated and is now in what I'd call final shape. The
> buggy paragraph on steps and scaled display is removed. Only hSize and
> trsf are mentionned since they let one do all possible things the simple
> way. No mention of a "reference" state.
>
Many thanks you Bruno for your work, it is more clear now. I did not fully
get the display issue but I suspect that is not fundamental.
>
> >
> > I think fork would be the best alternative in some respects, but let's
>
Guys, let me say that forking is never the best alternative. I believe
collaboration is always possible, given that one explains clearly what is
the final goal and add documentation inherent to it.
Cheers.
Chiara
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev>
> Post to : yade-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev>
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
References
-
periodic boundary consolidation
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2011-01-29
-
Re: periodic boundary consolidation
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2011-01-30
-
Re: periodic boundary consolidation
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2011-01-30
-
Re: periodic boundary consolidation
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2011-01-31
-
Re: periodic boundary consolidation
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2011-01-31
-
Re: periodic boundary consolidation
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2011-01-31
-
Re: periodic boundary consolidation
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2011-01-31
-
Re: periodic boundary consolidation
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2011-02-01
-
Re: periodic boundary consolidation
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2011-02-01
-
Re: periodic boundary consolidation
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2011-02-01
-
Re: periodic boundary consolidation
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2011-02-01
-
Re: periodic boundary consolidation
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2011-02-02