yade-users team mailing list archive
-
yade-users team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03147
Re: Periodic triaxial
> One more question. Why do not we move the spheres through the periodic
> boundaries instead of updating their positions? Would this be
> possible? I mean, like treating the periodic boundaries as walls. ATM,
> we use the rule of continuum mechanics to updated positions of
> discrete particles, but is this correct dealing with a particulate
> system? Would not be better to apply the strain rate to the moving
> periodic boundaries and as a consequence moving the balls?
The boundaries don't really exist, they are purely numerical entities
correspoding to Cell::refSize and Cell::trsf. Particles are free to move
in any way, they only interact as if they were copied in all (infinite
number of) periodic cells. Hope this answers your question.
Vaclav
Follow ups
References
-
Periodic triaxial
From: boon chiaweng, 2010-05-17
-
Re: Periodic triaxial
From: chiara modenese, 2010-05-24
-
Re: Periodic triaxial
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2010-05-24
-
Re: Periodic triaxial
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2010-05-24
-
Re: Periodic triaxial
From: chiara modenese, 2010-05-24
-
Re: Periodic triaxial
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2010-05-24
-
Re: Periodic triaxial
From: chiara modenese, 2010-05-24
-
Re: Periodic triaxial
From: chiara modenese, 2010-05-24
-
Re: Periodic triaxial
From: chiara modenese, 2010-05-24
-
Re: Periodic triaxial
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2010-05-26
-
Re: Periodic triaxial
From: chiara modenese, 2010-05-26
-
Re: Periodic triaxial
From: boon chiaweng, 2010-05-26
-
Re: Periodic triaxial
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2010-05-26
-
Re: Periodic triaxial
From: chiara modenese, 2010-05-27
-
Re: Periodic triaxial
From: chiara modenese, 2010-05-27
-
Re: Periodic triaxial
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2010-05-28
-
Re: Periodic triaxial
From: chiara modenese, 2010-05-29
-
Re: Periodic triaxial
From: chiara modenese, 2010-06-02