banking-addons-drivers team mailing list archive

[Joël Grand-Guillaume <joel.grandguillaume@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Back from holidays, just wanna say thanks for this contribs ! This is the
way to go.


On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 11:22 PM, Bidoul, Stéphane <stephane.bidoul@xxxxxxxxx
> wrote:

> MP submitted. Looking forward to your feedback.
>
> -sbi
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Bidoul, Stéphane <
> stephane.bidoul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>  On the other hand, banking-addons-70 has a killer feature: SEPA credit
>>> transfers (not mentioning several great features around bank accounts).
>>>
>>>  So to see if we can use both, I've created a proof-of-concept branch
>>> with the simple goal of cutting the dependency between
>>> account_banking_payment and the core account_banking module (which modifies
>>> bank statements behaviour). Pulling the thread I ended up with the
>>> following:
>>>
>>>
=> This is great !


> ...
>>> What kind of granularity did you have in mind? I think we can identify
>>> the following functionalities:
>>>
>>> - Having state and period per statement line. Future: to be made
>>> non-conflicting with account_bank_statement_extensions
>>>
>>
=> Done in account_statement_ext<http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Ebanking-addons-team/banking-addons/bank-statement-reconcile-70/files/head:/account_statement_ext/>module
(with other basic improvements that probably everybody needs). Most
of them are also in the account_banking one. May be one common moduleto
both project to provide basic bank statement improvements would be great.
Currently, we have put in that module (see features section) :
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~banking-addons-team/banking-addons/bank-statement-reconcile-70/view/head:/account_statement_ext/__openerp__.py

We though that would be useful for anybody. That's the minimum we install
in our customer.


>
>>>   Suggested module name: account_banking
>>>
>>> - Import wizard (including metadata structure) without (automatic)
>>> reconciliation. Future: mabye to be integrated with or dropped in favour of
>>> C2C's modules
>>>
>>
=> Currently done on our side in:
<http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Ebanking-addons-team/banking-addons/bank-statement-reconcile-70/files/head:/account_statement_base_import/>
account_statement_base_import<http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Ebanking-addons-team/banking-addons/bank-statement-reconcile-70/files/head:/account_statement_base_import/>and
account_statement_base_completion
<http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Ebanking-addons-team/banking-addons/bank-statement-reconcile-70/files/head:/account_statement_base_completion/>


>
>>>   Suggested module name: account_banking_import
>>>   Depends on: account_banking
>>>
>>> - Link partner wizard (to depend on import/metadata functionality)
>>>
>>>   Suggested module name: account_banking_partner
>>>   Depends on: account_banking_import
>>>
>>> - Reconciliation wizard and rough auto-matching logic (to depend on
>>> import/metadata functionality and partner wizard).
>>>
>>>   Suggested module name: account_banking_reconciliation
>>>   Depends on: account_banking_partner
>>>
>>
=> Currently done on our side in (without using voucher) :
account_advanced_reconcile<http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Ebanking-addons-team/banking-addons/bank-statement-reconcile-70/files/head:/account_advanced_reconcile/>and
account_easy_reconcile
<http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Ebanking-addons-team/banking-addons/bank-statement-reconcile-70/files/head:/account_easy_reconcile/>





 - IBAN lookup
>>>
>>>   Suggested module name: base_iban_lookup
>>>   Depends on: account_iban_preserve_domestic module
>>>
>>> Does this sound reasonable? Only thing is that I'm afraid that I cannot
>>> say how much time we would be able to devote to such a refactoring.
>>>
>>
Very reasonable ! Thanks you  !




-- 


*camptocamp*
INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS
BY OPEN SOURCE EXPERTS

*Joël Grand-Guillaume*
Division Manager
Business Solutions

+41 21 619 10 28
www.camptocamp.com