← Back to team overview

fenics team mailing list archive

Re: Version numbers

 

On 16 August 2011 11:59, Kent-Andre Mardal <kent-and@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 16 August 2011 11:57, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:28:53AM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
>> > Agree with Kent. For example UFL and UFC will hopefully be more stable
>> > than DOLFIN.
>> >
>> > FEniCS-2011-08 does not sound like a beta though,
>> > can it be FEniCS-2011-08-beta? Or FEniCS-2011-09-beta
>> > since the final will likely be FEniCS-2011-09?
>>
>> One possibility that Johannes has suggested is to let the FEniCS
>> package number follow the DOLFIN package number. For most users, that
>> is the most interesting number.
>>
>
> Sounds good to me.
> Kent

Ok!

Martin


Follow ups

References