← Back to team overview

fenics team mailing list archive

Re: Version numbers

 

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Martin Sandve Alnæs
<martinal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 16 August 2011 11:59, Kent-Andre Mardal <kent-and@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 16 August 2011 11:57, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:28:53AM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
>>> > Agree with Kent. For example UFL and UFC will hopefully be more stable
>>> > than DOLFIN.
>>> >
>>> > FEniCS-2011-08 does not sound like a beta though,
>>> > can it be FEniCS-2011-08-beta? Or FEniCS-2011-09-beta
>>> > since the final will likely be FEniCS-2011-09?
>>>
>>> One possibility that Johannes has suggested is to let the FEniCS
>>> package number follow the DOLFIN package number. For most users, that
>>> is the most interesting number.
>>>
>>
>> Sounds good to me.
>> Kent
>
> Ok!
>
> Martin

Ok, I'm preparing the new packages as fenics-1.0-beta then.

Johannes


Follow ups

References