kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #11137
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 04:38:13AM -0600, Brian F. G. Bidulock wrote:
> You don't need list of layers: just from and to--a pair.
How do you fit mask, silk and other technical layers in a range? I agree
that it would work for copped layers. But IMHO the 'right' solution
would be to have a pin object containing it's instances for each layer
i.e.
Pin 1
Pin 1 on front
Pin 1 on inner 1
Pin 1 on inner 2
Pin 1 on back
Pin 1 on silk front
Pin 1 on mask front
Pin 1 on mask back
Pin 1 on assembly front
Pin 1 on assembly back
That would allow you to have 'true' padstacks. Vias of course could remain
range based (unless you wanted to personalize via by layers, that could be
overkill)
--
Lorenzo Marcantonio
Logos Srl
Follow ups
References
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Brian Sidebotham, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: jp charras, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio, 2013-09-02
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock, 2013-09-03
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio, 2013-09-03
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock, 2013-09-03
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Lorenzo Marcantonio, 2013-09-03
-
Re: Experiments and considerations for more layer
From: Brian F. G. Bidulock, 2013-09-03