lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive

[Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 26 August 2012 10:30, Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Lars,
>
> cancel that, i found it in my log file. I've now subscribed directly to
> it[1]
>
> Regards,
>
> Phill.
> 1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1041625
>
>
> On 26 August 2012 10:24, Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> For me?
>>
>> yeah the bug number! I had a reboot after major update & cannot find it!
>> The guy from #ubuntu+1 I was chatting to is afk, so I cannot ask him but
>> others may have a look.
>>
>>  Thanks,
>>
>> Phill.
>>
>>
>> On 26 August 2012 10:10, Lars Noodén <lars.nooden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/26/12 12:07 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
>>> > Hi Lars,
>>> >
>>> > can you get the info from /var/log to paste up? along with an lspci
>>> from
>>> > it, and a cat /proc/cpuinfo
>>> >
>>> > Please feed the #ubuntu+1 team some crumbs :) They will look into it,
>>> but
>>> > really do need something to go on!
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >
>>> > Phill.
>>>
>>> Yes, I've gotten syslog, lightdm.log, Xorg.0.log, output from lspci and
>>> cpuinfo uploaded as attachments to the bug.  Anything else?  Dave
>>> Gilbert seemed to think the problem is with X and added that to the
>>> bug's subject.  Certainly X does not start and I cannot even forward X
>>> apps from the machine via SSH.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> /Lars
>>>
>>> > On 26 August 2012 09:15, Lars Noodén <lars.nooden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On 8/25/12 9:16 PM, Phill Whiteside wrote:
>>> >>> Lars,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> #ubuntu+1 have confirmed my initial thoughts, please try to get
>>> terminal
>>> >>> session up & ubuntu-bug ubiquity for them
>>> >>
>>> >> The apport-* series does not work, giving python errors:
>>> >>
>>> >>         ERROR: The launchpadlib Python module is not installed.
>>> >>         This functionality is not available.
>>> >>
>>> >> Same with ubuntu-bug if I try to associate it with an existing bug
>>> >> report (#1041625)
>>> >>
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1041625
>>> >>
>>> >> I've done the update:
>>> >>         apt-get update && apt-get -y upgrade && apt-get -y
>>> dist-upgrade
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >> /Lars
>>> >>
>>> >>> (19:06:45) phillw: anyone want more info from the tester?
>>> >>> (19:07:39) penguin42: phillw: The fontconfig bit is a redherring
>>> >>> (19:07:59) penguin42: phillw: Everything is moaning about fontconfig
>>> but
>>> >>> carrying on; so it's something separate
>>> >>> (19:08:40) phillw: penguin42: it appears to be stopping the
>>> installation?
>>> >>> Lars is a fairly experienced tester, what more do you need?
>>> >>> (19:08:58) penguin42: phillw: can he get to a text shell at that
>>> point?
>>> >>> (19:09:34) phillw: I'll have to email him - he is not IRC person
>>> >>> (19:09:47) phillw: if he can, what do you need?
>>> >>> (19:10:06) penguin42: phillw: If he can get to a text shell and
>>> bring up
>>> >>> networking then get him to run ubuntu-bug ubiquity and it'll post a
>>> load
>>> >> of
>>> >>> stuff to launchpad
>>> >>> (19:10:34) ActionParsnip: phillw: did you update ubiquity before
>>> kicking
>>> >> it
>>> >>> off?
>>> >>> (19:10:34) phillw: penguin42: that is what I suggested to him :)
>>> >>> (19:10:58) penguin42: phillw: If not it's a little difficult; I'd
>>> make
>>> >> more
>>> >>> of a guess in terms of X/graphics issues - when he says old, how
>>> old/what
>>> >>> spec?
>>> >>> (19:11:20) phillw: I just wanted to check if i was on the correct
>>> track
>>> >> to
>>> >>> get the data you need.
>>> >>> (19:13:05) phillw: it is not within the bounds of possibiliiity that
>>> it
>>> >> is
>>> >>> the PAE/ non-PAE kernel etc. But I'd have expected it to complain
>>> long
>>> >>> before that?
>>> >>> (19:15:57) penguin42: yeh
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Regards,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Phill.
>>> >>> On 25 August 2012 18:59, Phill Whiteside <PhillW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Hi Lars,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> off the top of my head....  issue it to Ubiquity, that is the system
>>> >> that
>>> >>>> does the installs. The devs can always re-allocate it later. Does it
>>> >> try to
>>> >>>> make a bug report? If not, then I'd suggest using the bug-report
>>> >> function
>>> >>>> to get the data off the system.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Thanks,
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Phill.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On 25 August 2012 18:39, Lars Noodén <lars.nooden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> I've got an old i386 machine that runs 12.04 fine but with 12.10
>>> daily
>>> >>>>> (several versions) it will not finish booting.  After the text
>>> screen,
>>> >>>>> it comes up with a screenful of Fontconfig warnings. e.g.:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>         Fontconfig warning:
>>> "/etc/fonts/conf.d/90-fonts-nanum.conf",
>>> >>>>>         line 40: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported
>>> and
>>> >>>>>         may not works as expected.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> I'll have this machine for a few more days at least so I can do a
>>> >> little
>>> >>>>> testing with it.  What other data would be needed before I file a
>>> bug
>>> >>>>> report?
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Regards,
>>> >>>>> /Lars
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> --
>>> >>>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
>>> >>>>> Post to     : lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >>>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~lubuntu-qa
>>> >>>>> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>>
>
>
>
> --
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>



-- 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw