openerp-community team mailing list archive
-
openerp-community team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03737
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
@Olivier,
Good image. (see attachment)
Now OCB is sticky branch in runbot.openerp.com
Thank you.
+1 Fabien
We need use runbot for a SQA and add test yaml, use guidelines...
I took the liberty of creating a development flow
See next link
Development flow for OCB with
runbot<https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwPeHBuUYqNsRU8tZUtTVVVhTEE/edit?usp=sharing>
El oct 29, 2013 9:58 AM, Lionel Sausin, de la part de l'équipe informatique
Numérigraphe <informatique@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:
> Le 29/10/2013 10:09, Joël Grand-Guillaume a écrit :
>
>> (...) So, at the end, the question will be : How OpenERP SA can benefit
>> from us ;) ?!
>>
> Being an end user, I could just as well ask how you can all benefit from
> us ?
> Joking of course - well, half joking at least. But let's not forget the
> community is a 3 players game please : OpenERP SA, service providers, users.
>
> I'd really like to jump in and help with OCBs as soon as I can, but for
> the moment it's not clear how another fork is going to lower my maintenance
> costs, quite the contrary.
>
> Seeing the big integrators cooperate is great, seeing OpenERP SA take part
> in this discussion is even greater.
> It's just - sometimes it has an air of feudalism, where great lords engage
> into battles, and users are just serfs. Please tell me it's just me being
> too much of a sans-culotte!
>
> I'm not in favor of having 2 OCB branches (too much work). I think OCB
>> should be part of the Official project (it deserve it). Weekly merge from
>> OCB to Stable should be done with your review (accepting what you want, and
>> not what you don't). This is manageable and you will still get lot's of
>> input from us (making the bugfix process quicker). You'll spend less time
>> merging our work with some filter rather than re-making the fix we already
>> did.
>>
> OK so may what would you think of this :
> - keep having feature branches
> - make MPs to OCB
> - when MP is merged into OCB, have a bot automatically make an MP of the
> same branch into stable, stating that it's already been reviewed and
> accepted in OCB. I suppose the 2nd MP can even be own by the OCB team.
>
> Lionel.
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~**openerp-community<https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community>
> Post to : openerp-community@lists.**launchpad.net<openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~**openerp-community<https://launchpad.net/~openerp-community>
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/**ListHelp<https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp>
>
Follow ups
References
-
Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Nhomar Hernández, 2013-10-22
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Quentin THEURET, 2013-10-23
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-24
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Ronald Portier, 2013-10-24
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Olivier Dony, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan, 2013-10-25
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Joël Grand-Guillaume, 2013-10-28
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Olivier Dony, 2013-10-28
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-28
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan Rijnhart, 2013-10-28
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Mario Arias, 2013-10-29
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-29
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Joël Grand-Guillaume, 2013-10-29
-
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Lionel Sausin, de la part de l'équipe informatique Numérigraphe, 2013-10-29