openerp-community team mailing list archive

["Lionel Sausin, de la part de l'équipe informatique Numérigraphe" <informatique@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Le 29/10/2013 10:09, Joël Grand-Guillaume a écrit :
> (...) So, at the end, the question will be : How OpenERP SA can 
> benefit from us ;) ?!
Being an end user, I could just as well ask how you can all benefit from 
us ?
Joking of course - well, half joking at least. But let's not forget the 
community is a 3 players game please : OpenERP SA, service providers, users.

I'd really like to jump in and help with OCBs as soon as I can, but for 
the moment it's not clear how another fork is going to lower my 
maintenance costs, quite the contrary.

Seeing the big integrators cooperate is great, seeing OpenERP SA take 
part in this discussion is even greater.
It's just - sometimes it has an air of feudalism, where great lords 
engage into battles, and users are just serfs. Please tell me it's just 
me being too much of a sans-culotte!

> I'm not in favor of having 2 OCB branches (too much work). I think OCB 
> should be part of the Official project (it deserve it). Weekly merge 
> from OCB to Stable should be done with your review (accepting what you 
> want, and not what you don't). This is manageable and you will still 
> get lot's of input from us (making the bugfix process quicker). You'll 
> spend less time merging our work with some filter rather than 
> re-making the fix we already did.
OK so may what would you think of this :
- keep having feature branches
- make MPs to OCB
- when MP is merged into OCB, have a bot automatically make an MP of the 
same branch into stable, stating that it's already been reviewed and 
accepted in OCB. I suppose the 2nd MP can even be own by the OCB team.

Lionel.