← Back to team overview

p2psp team mailing list archive

Re: Prevention of pollution attacks (GSoC)

 

Hello!,

Yes, trusted peer and attacker have always the same position (attacker - 1,
TP - 2), but this doesn't affect on the result because of random latencies.
Splitter always have peer list in random order because of latencies.
Here's log file of experiment with 50 peers.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/cy2ljkacbs605c3/log_50peers.txt?dl=0 - 100
experiments, 50 peers, with buffers (48 Mb)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rmiet1vby1f46hf/avg_posioned_chunks_a1_t1_p50.txt?dl=0
- 100 experiments, 50 peers, without buffers (167 Kb)
When I prepared the results, I simply 'grepped' the strings with regex and
paste it in google sheet.

Also, I have pushed the new code in my branch (lp:~im-shakirov/p2psp/sim)

2015-03-18 5:13 GMT+06:00 Vicente Gonzalez <vicente.gonzalez.ruiz@xxxxxxxxx>
:

>
>
> 2015-03-17 19:07 GMT+01:00 Ilshat Shakirov <im.shakirov@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I performed a small experimens, results are here:
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pc6yb87xJy8gNkWSWvvCvjAjR6WBFdOzCbPvO-zEooU/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>>
>> (On first tab of document is raw data from simulator).
>> Few words about experiment - I performed it 100 times for each network
>> size. Experiment was performed with 1 trusted peer and 1 attacker.
>> Simulation value of poisoned chunks simply is average from all experimens.
>>
>> You can see that simulation value is always greater than P / 2. I think
>> it should be taken into account. Am I wrong? What do you think?
>>
>> PS. What parameters should I use in the next experiments? Im about number
>> of trusted peers, attackers, network size. Thanks in advance.
>>
>>
> Hi IIshat,
>
> in your simulations the attacker and the trusted peer have always the same
> "position" in the team. In other words, the attacker is always for example
> the peer number 2 and the trusted peer is the peer number 1?
>
> Anyway, your results are very close to the theoretical results.I don't
> think you are doing something wrong. However, could you post the output of
> one of your simulations?
>
> Regards,
> Vicente.
> --
> Vicente González Ruiz
> Depto de Informática
> Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería
> Universidad de Almería
>
> Carretera Sacramento S/N
> 04120, La Cañada de San Urbano
> Almería, España
>
> e-mail: vruiz@xxxxxx
> http://www.ual.es/~vruiz
> tel: +34 950 015711
> fax: +34 950 015486
>

Follow ups

References