← Back to team overview

torios team mailing list archive

Re: The History of ToriOS Websites

 

Den 2016-01-04 kl. 13:13, skrev Ali/amjjawad:
> Hi George and everyone else,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 10:39 PM, George DiceGeorge
> <dicegeorge@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dicegeorge@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> 
>     maybe you misunderstand me,
>     http://torios.dicenews.com/
>     is only set up as a temporary address
>     until torios.net <http://torios.net> or torios.top etc
>     are pointed there,
>     which ould take five minutes.
>      
>     Its provided by http://www.hatters.org.uk/
> 
> 
> Indeed I understood and that is why I sent more than one email to
> explain the situation and make things clear. We don't need temporary
> solutions. While it might seems weird/odd but I prefer our website to be
> down rather than waste time and energy on building a temporary website
> that might serve us few days.
> 
> You see, we have waited for so long to have a decent website. I'm
> personally not interested in temporary solutions and I think Nio agrees
> with me.
> 

Hi Ali, George and all other toriosadores,

@ Ali and George, please try to understand each other :-)

@ everybody,

George describes how his offer is likely to work for a long time, and
that we can point any web address to it.

Ali describes how important it is to have a long-term solution. He
thinks a commercial solution is more long-term than that of a voluntary
organisation.

I think that it is important that a central person of ToriOS owns the
web address. This is solved by Ali with torios.top.

I'm not sure a one-person or two-person company is likely to stay in
business longer than a voluntary organisation, that has already survived
for some years. At this moment I do not 'agree more' with either of you.

Assuming nobody else is ready to pay now, I can afford £36 (36 pounds)
and can promise to pay for the first year. But, one year from now, if
nobody else is willing to pay for at least part of the second year, I
would conclude, that nobody else is interested enough in that solution
for ToriOS, and I might stop paying for it.

---
> I am NOT yet sure which package is good for us? assuming starter is
> good enough:
> 3 Pound/Month
> 36 Pound/Year
---

@ all other toriosadores,

ToriOS needs input from more people in this discussion in order to find
a solution that is good enough. Please tell us what *you* think :-)

Best regards
Nio


Follow ups

References