ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive

[Sergio Schvezov <sergio.schvezov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 18/12/13 10:46, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
> <lukasz.zemczak@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > First of all: as per the other e-mail, we still don't have a better tool
> > ;) As Alexander mentioned, this transition was not planned ahead and
> > synced with anyone, so for now we're still stuck with the spreadsheet.
> >
> > The topic of 'who can add requests' needs to be discussed through then.
> > I understand the problem with having to poke a manager just to get
> > things landed, but I want to make sure there won't be no chaos if just
> > anyone can fill in a landing proposition. I'm not saying there will be
> > chaos and destruction ;)! Just being cautious.
> Sure, but let's try to open it first and see how it goes, in case of
> chaos, we can move back to depend on a manager.
>
> Let's always try to be more open and friendly until something bad
> happens that could be enough to justify such restrictions.

If it comes to it, can't submission (bug creation be open) but the ack 
of the bug be conviened by the landing team with the managers?

Personally, I feel that the latter part of manager intervention should 
only be necessary for controversial packages; controversial: non daily 
release or automated no testing or big dependency chained rebuild 
required landings).

And here's a long shot... If managers have to know every nitty bitty 
gritty detail of what I want to land, that's just another fancy way of 
saying micro management.