unity-design team mailing list archive

["Paulo J. S. Silva" <pjssilva@xxxxxxxxxx>]

If this is the direction, let it be...

However, I have the feeling that it would be more consistent to keep
the icons and only get rid of them all at once. Instead of having some
menus with and others without icons. Visual consistency is important,
IMHO.

best,

Paulo


2009/11/9 Mark Shuttleworth <mark@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> Paulo J. S. Silva wrote:
>
> I must agree.
>
> It feels now very odd to see the Systems menu without any icons (only
> to open a submenu like Administration or Settings with tons of icons
> in it). All other menus in the panel have icons (applications and
> places). I don't see why Systems doesn't. I knew something was
> perturbing me and now I see the problem, as mac_v said, it is the lack
> of consistency. And now we have the indicator applet (which is a mix
> between a launcher and an status display) also avoid icons. That is
> two menus with and two without icons.
>
>
> The GNOME Shell effort is doing away with the Applications, Places and
> System menus. And our Netbook launcher Unity doesn't have them, either. And
> there are many things running on your system which don't have icons! So this
> is the general direction we are heading in.
>
> Mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
> Post to     : ayatana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>



-- 
Paulo José da Silva e Silva
Professor Associado, Dep. de Ciência da Computação
(Associate Professor, Computer Science Dept.)
Universidade de São Paulo - Brazil

e-mail: pjssilva@xxxxxxxxxx         Web: http://www.ime.usp.br/~pjssilva