yade-users team mailing list archive
-
yade-users team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02966
Re: Energy dissipation + radius of fictious "box" sphere is now =r (not 2*r)
On 3 May 2010 17:23, chiara modenese <c.modenese@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 21 April 2010 18:23, Bruno Chareyre <bruno.chareyre@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> It is commited now (r2170). I've put the symmetric IGeom for box-sphere in
>> this commit as well (removed the "2" factor).
>> I didn't test energy tracing at all yet. Any feedback is welcome.
>
>
> Hi Bruno,
>
> I'd like to monitor the elastic energy of the system with the basic contact
> law, how can I call the function you wrote in your contact law per each time
> step? Can I do that in py?
> Btw, do we have in function that get the kinetic energy of the system? I
> see it is done in the triaxial test, what if I am not using the triaxial?
>
btw, in the triaxial the kinetic energy does not account for angular
velocities, whereas in Shop class it does
> Should I derive a new class from Recorder?
>
> thanks, Chiara
>
>>
>>
>> Bruno
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-users>
>> Post to : yade-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-users>
>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>>
>
>
Follow ups
References
-
Energy dissipation
From: chiara modenese, 2010-04-20
-
Re: Energy dissipation
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2010-04-21
-
Re: Energy dissipation
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2010-04-21
-
Re: Energy dissipation
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2010-04-21
-
Re: Energy dissipation
From: chiara modenese, 2010-04-21
-
Re: Energy dissipation
From: chiara modenese, 2010-04-21
-
Re: Energy dissipation
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2010-04-21
-
Re: Energy dissipation
From: chiara modenese, 2010-04-21
-
Re: Energy dissipation + radius of fictious "box" sphere is now =r (not 2*r)
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2010-04-21
-
Re: Energy dissipation + radius of fictious "box" sphere is now =r (not 2*r)
From: chiara modenese, 2010-05-03