coapp-developers team mailing list archive
-
coapp-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00440
Re: Code?
(stripped who wrote what, because with the last few posts to this
thread seemingly lacking any text not marked as reply, I've lost
track...)
>>> A compromise would be to have a very small bootstrapping CoApp engine
>>> with no dependencies, that downloads the necessary components, and
>>> eventually, the runtime libraries, and then runs the whole CoApp
>>> engine.
If the engine doesn't have these dependencies in the first place, we
don't need yet another bootstrap. How many levels do you want?
Yes, we will run into the need to have MSVCR## on the system very
quickly once people start using the engine to install packages, but
IMHO it should be because they've installed something that depends on
it. It'll have to be "packaged" as an alien, but we've already had
that idea.
We don't need to bootstrap the bootstrapping bootstrap for the engine
bootstrap bootstrap. Bootstrap bootstrap bootstrap. Just write the
engine standalone - end of discussion. Please?
Regards,
Phil
Follow ups
References
-
Code?
From: Olaf van der Spek, 2010-05-17
-
Re: Code?
From: Elizabeth M Smith, 2010-05-17
-
Re: Code?
From: Trevor Dennis, 2010-05-17
-
Re: Code?
From: Trent Nelson, 2010-05-20
-
Re: Code?
From: Rivera, Rafael, 2010-05-20
-
Re: Code?
From: Olaf van der Spek, 2010-05-20
-
Re: Code?
From: Rivera, Rafael, 2010-05-20
-
Re: Code?
From: William A. Rowe Jr., 2010-05-20
-
Re: Code?
From: Geoffroy Couprie, 2010-05-21