fenics team mailing list archive

[Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 01:58:50PM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Martin Sandve Alnæs
> <martinal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 16 August 2011 11:59, Kent-Andre Mardal <kent-and@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 16 August 2011 11:57, Anders Logg <logg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 09:28:53AM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> >>> > Agree with Kent. For example UFL and UFC will hopefully be more stable
> >>> > than DOLFIN.
> >>> >
> >>> > FEniCS-2011-08 does not sound like a beta though,
> >>> > can it be FEniCS-2011-08-beta? Or FEniCS-2011-09-beta
> >>> > since the final will likely be FEniCS-2011-09?
> >>>
> >>> One possibility that Johannes has suggested is to let the FEniCS
> >>> package number follow the DOLFIN package number. For most users, that
> >>> is the most interesting number.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Sounds good to me.
> >> Kent
> >
> > Ok!
> >
> > Martin
>
> Ok, I'm preparing the new packages as fenics-1.0-beta then.

Sounds good!

--
Anders