kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #12882
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
I like the second option. Reminds me of Altium.
Would adding a console window to the bottom be useful? Use it to set/clear
environment variables and run scripts.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Jean-Samuel Reynaud <js.reynaud@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find attached a quick view of 3 possibles frame on wxpython
> project manager.
> I'm not a specialist of ergonomics/design but it is some ideas I have.
>
> 1/ a welcome frame
> Should include logo, welcome message and a list of last opened projects
> for example
>
> 2/ Projects
> On the two options project are tabs (horizontal). Two options for the
> content of a project frame:
>
> Option1: Vertical tabs for schematic/footprint association/pcb
> => In this case all configuration (project configuration...) should
> be done inside the main menu as before
>
> Option2: Tree
> => In this case a rigth click on project open a submenu with
> configuration options
> => Same for all others tree entries (right click on pcb will allow
> edition of pcb parameters...)
> => The schematic hiearchicy should be visible directly on this tree as
> sub items
>
> To build this I use wxFormBuilder to start and some override to handle
> event/image/content...
>
> Is it the way you are waiting for ?
> Suggestions, comments ?
>
> @dick
> For the moment, the code do nothing it only a skeleton but I can
> commit/push it you want
>
> Le 02/04/2014 23:32, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit :
> > On 04/02/2014 12:39 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> >> Here is more info, which will help you create some low level mock up
> classes.
> >>
> >> Class KIWAY_MGR:
> >> (temporarily in kicad/kicad.cpp) will get swigged, creating a python
> class implemented
> >> fully in C++. It is a collection of PROJECTs/KIWAYs. The constructor
> of this class may
> >> take a wxFrame*, so we have the option of hooking child frames into
> that parent. Possible
> >> functions:
> >> createProject( full_path_to_pro_file )
> >> openProject( full_path_to_pro_file )
> >> listProjects()
> >>
> >>
> >> Class KIWAY:
> >> will get swigged, creating a python class implemented fully in C++.
> Possible functions:
> >> openSchematic() no args required, schematic's name is in the *.pro
> file.
> >> openBoard() no args required, board's name is in the *.pro file.
> >>
> >>
> >> Just with this sketch, you should be able to mock enough both of these
> classes, enough to
> >> work magic at in the UI layer. If you want to open dummy child frames,
> that would be ok
> >> from openSchematic and openBoard().
> >>
> >>
> >> Feel free to add functions as you find needs for them. This will give
> us an aspect of top
> >> down design.
> >>
> >>
> >> HTH,
> >>
> >> Dick
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 04/02/2014 11:58 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> >>> Hi Jean-Samuel,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks very much for your willingness to help!
> >>>
> >>> In answer to your question:
> >>>
> >>> The wxPython project manager sketch up should concentrate on the user
> interface, not the
> >>> actual loading of the sub programs. In fact, if it did not load the
> subprograms at all,
> >>> that would be acceptable. The screen real-estate usage, and the icons
> and whatnot are
> >>> what's important for now. You could create scaffolding to mark a
> project and a kiface as
> >>> being loaded, and test your UI code against that scaffolding, without
> ever loading any
> >>> projects or opening any child frames.
> >>>
> >>> In milestone B) we are putting a top C++ API into the KIWAY, this is
> not designed yet.
> >>> You should not use the KIFACE from python, that was never intended.
> Python will use the
> >>> KIWAY API, which in turn will manage the KIFACE's and projects using
> C++.
> >>>
> >>> If you really really want to launch something, then encapsulate that
> python code into
> >>> something which will be replaced later, and simply load pcbnew.exe for
> now from that
> >>> disposable code. This code will get swapped out later, in favor of
> the KIWAY API, which
> >>> will do the actuall loading of the *.kiface, again from C++. This is
> necessary so that
> >>> the KIFACE to KIFACE
> > oops, meant not "KIFACE to KIFACE", but rather
> >
> > "project specific KIWAY_PLAYER to KIWAY_PLAYER"
> >
> >
> > comms can work for things like back annotation, and pcbnew<->eeschema
> >>> cross-probing, per project.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> There's actually little value in loading executables or kiface's right
> now. Folks will
> >>> use the C++ project manager until the user interface in the python
> project manager is
> >>> superior. So please focus on the user interface, that's the value
> added stuff.
> >>>
> >>> After milestone B) that's when we start to worry about loading the
> submodules (kifaces).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>> Dick
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 04/02/2014 11:23 AM, Jean-Samuel Reynaud wrote:
> >>>> Hi
> >>>>
> >>>> As I understand, one of the feature of this new interface is to load
> directly from python
> >>>> the kiface interface (instead of just launch the program aka
> pcbnew/cvpcb for example).
> >>>> Is it right ?
> >>>> As I see, the function KIFACE_1 return a struct with inside all
> function to use (one of
> >>>> them is createwindow).
> >>>> Could you confirm it's the way you think about ?
> >>>> If yes, ctypes from python will help me and I think I'll fight with
> the structure
> >>>> definition inside python...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2014-04-01 15:47 GMT+02:00 Dick Hollenbeck <dick@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> dick@xxxxxxxxxxx>>:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> In English there is a saying: "Competition breeds success."
> >>>>
> >>>> I would consider it a luxury to be able to choose [pieces] from
> multiple implementations.
> >>>> Competition in this case is not exactly cruel and unusual
> punishment. In fact it could
> >>>> be an *awful lot of fun*, since wxPython is such a high level
> language and so much can be
> >>>> done in so few lines of code.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> You may either compete or collaborate. I think we'll get more
> ideas if there is
> >>>> competition. After choices are made, you can continue to
> compete, improving, innovating
> >>>> and serving your own needs, even if your code is not merged up to
> that point in time.
> >>>> Repeat that last sentence.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Any implementation which does not meet the primary objective:
> "showing which projects are
> >>>> open, among a larger set of project possibilities" will lose the
> competition. (Even if
> >>>> there is only one entry into the competition, *multiple* open
> projects is a mandate.)
> >>>> Using screen real estate for a permanently visible directory tree
> may not be an optimal
> >>>> pathway to achieving the objective.
> >>>>
> >>>> Some tips:
> >>>>
> >>>> a) the directory tree does not give sufficient emphasis on what
> constitutes a project.
> >>>>
> >>>> b) the directory tree does not give the ability to show several
> open projects without a
> >>>> sea of rows of actual files in between.
> >>>>
> >>>> c) we need to be more project centric, less file centric.
> >>>>
> >>>> d) once projects have been defined, the user interface procedure
> to opening the schematic
> >>>> or layout tools on any of those projects needs to be lean.
> >>>>
> >>>> e) I'm thinking the set of files that constitute a project can
> continue to reside in the
> >>>> *.pro file.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 04/01/2014 07:24 AM, dileep kushwaha wrote:
> >>>> > Hi,
> >>>> > I have so far made the menubar for the wxPython. I now
> want to integrate the
> >>>> > mainmenu.py to KiCAD instead of .cpp codes. I little hint and
> guidence will be great. I
> >>>> > can send the code. Its ugly right now. i'll modify it according
> to guidlines after
> >>>> > completing significant portion...(i see three .cpp files that
> will have to changed)
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:14 AM, dileep kushwaha <
> dilzverykool@xxxxxxxxx
> >>>> <mailto:dilzverykool@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> > <mailto:dilzverykool@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:dilzverykool@xxxxxxxxx>>>
> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Hi,
> >>>> > Please accept my apology for the delay from my side. I
> can give you few results
> >>>> > in maximum one week's time. I am able to make an exact
> replica of KiCAD window
> >>>> that we
> >>>> > have right now. I was carried away and wanted the GUI to
> look pretty innovative.
> >>>> I was
> >>>> > looking into the feasibility of an idea. The idea comes
> from a member who
> >>>> proposed it
> >>>> > to have a game like GUI. I was thinking if right click
> would give list of options
> >>>> > surrounding it in circle. I think I will have to wait a
> little more to get
> >>>> expertise.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I was shying away from showing my work. Apparently I will
> start uploading on the
> >>>> > branch by evening 6PM IST(Indian Standard Time)
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Jean-Samuel Reynaud <
> js.reynaud@xxxxxxxxx
> >>>> <mailto:js.reynaud@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> > <mailto:js.reynaud@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:js.reynaud@xxxxxxxxx>>>
> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Ok I'm starting to work to meet window 1).
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > 2014-03-31 17:01 GMT+02:00 Dick Hollenbeck <
> dick@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> <mailto:dick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> > <mailto:dick@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dick@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On 03/24/2014 10:19 AM, Jean-Samuel Reynaud wrote:
> >>>> > > Hi,
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > I can help too on this project. Tell me if you
> need more help.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> https://code.launchpad.net/~kicad-developers/kicad/prj-mgr
> >>>> >
> >>>> > is still empty, so therefore I need help.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > There are two windows of opportunity here, with a
> middle section where the
> >>>> > window is not open:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > 1) Now, before I get to milestone C)
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > 2) Me doing milestone C), where collisions of
> effort are so likely its most
> >>>> > sensible to
> >>>> > consider python contributions in this time
> un-helpful. Plus I don't
> >>>> know what
> >>>> > I'll have
> >>>> > to work with at this point. And I won't be waiting
> for it.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > 3) After the C++ layer and framework are in place,
> then collisions of effort
> >>>> > will not
> >>>> > concern me, the python project manager can and
> should be expanded into a
> >>>> number of
> >>>> > directions, and I don't expect to play a role in
> that.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I want to be clear about these two windows of
> opportunity, 1) & 3), and the
> >>>> > approximate
> >>>> > timing, at least the sequencing.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > The contributions that I would value most are in
> the window described by 1).
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > _______________________________________________
> >>>> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >>>> > Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> > <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> >>>> > Unsubscribe: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >>>> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > --
> >>>> > Dileep Kumar
> >>>> > M.Tech(VLSI Design)
> >>>> > Mob:9891455965
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
>
References
-
writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: dileep kushwaha, 2014-03-12
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-03-12
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-03-13
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: dileep kushwaha, 2014-03-24
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: dileep kushwaha, 2014-03-24
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Brian Sidebotham, 2014-03-24
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-03-24
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-03-24
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Jean-Samuel Reynaud, 2014-03-24
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-03-31
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Jean-Samuel Reynaud, 2014-03-31
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-04-01
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Jean-Samuel Reynaud, 2014-04-02
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-04-02
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-04-02
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-04-02
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Jean-Samuel Reynaud, 2014-04-03