kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #12892
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
Say with another tab, for example. Then it would list the project-specific
libraires, and one could open them for editing.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Dick Hollenbeck <dick@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04/04/2014 10:14 AM, Carl Poirier wrote:
> > Both look great, but I prefer option 1.
> >
> > What if the project-specific libraries were also accessible from there?
>
>
> Accessible in what way? Please elaborate in detail.
>
>
> I know it's not in
> > the initial requirements; I'm just throwing in the idea.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Dick Hollenbeck <dick@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:dick@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Jean-Samuel, very very much!
> >
> > You seem to have met the "multiple open projects" criterion, so your
> proposals are both
> > potential starting points. Since we're still in a brain-storming
> phase, I won't offer any
> > feedback yet, since that can stifle creativity during a
> brain-storming phase.
> >
> >
> > Dick
> >
> >
> > On 04/03/2014 03:30 PM, Jean-Samuel Reynaud wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Please find attached a quick view of 3 possibles frame on wxpython
> > > project manager.
> > > I'm not a specialist of ergonomics/design but it is some ideas I
> have.
> > >
> > > 1/ a welcome frame
> > > Should include logo, welcome message and a list of last opened
> projects
> > > for example
> > >
> > > 2/ Projects
> > > On the two options project are tabs (horizontal). Two options for
> the
> > > content of a project frame:
> > >
> > > Option1: Vertical tabs for schematic/footprint association/pcb
> > > => In this case all configuration (project configuration...)
> should
> > > be done inside the main menu as before
> > >
> > > Option2: Tree
> > > => In this case a rigth click on project open a submenu with
> > > configuration options
> > > => Same for all others tree entries (right click on pcb will
> allow
> > > edition of pcb parameters...)
> > > => The schematic hiearchicy should be visible directly on this
> tree as
> > > sub items
> > >
> > > To build this I use wxFormBuilder to start and some override to
> handle
> > > event/image/content...
> > >
> > > Is it the way you are waiting for ?
> > > Suggestions, comments ?
> > >
> > > @dick
> > > For the moment, the code do nothing it only a skeleton but I can
> > > commit/push it you want
> > >
> > > Le 02/04/2014 23:32, Dick Hollenbeck a écrit :
> > >> On 04/02/2014 12:39 PM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> > >>> Here is more info, which will help you create some low level
> mock up classes.
> > >>>
> > >>> Class KIWAY_MGR:
> > >>> (temporarily in kicad/kicad.cpp) will get swigged, creating a
> python class implemented
> > >>> fully in C++. It is a collection of PROJECTs/KIWAYs. The
> constructor of this
> > class may
> > >>> take a wxFrame*, so we have the option of hooking child frames
> into that parent.
> > Possible
> > >>> functions:
> > >>> createProject( full_path_to_pro_file )
> > >>> openProject( full_path_to_pro_file )
> > >>> listProjects()
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Class KIWAY:
> > >>> will get swigged, creating a python class implemented fully in
> C++. Possible
> > functions:
> > >>> openSchematic() no args required, schematic's name is in the
> *.pro file.
> > >>> openBoard() no args required, board's name is in the *.pro
> file.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Just with this sketch, you should be able to mock enough both of
> these classes,
> > enough to
> > >>> work magic at in the UI layer. If you want to open dummy child
> frames, that would
> > be ok
> > >>> from openSchematic and openBoard().
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Feel free to add functions as you find needs for them. This
> will give us an
> > aspect of top
> > >>> down design.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> HTH,
> > >>>
> > >>> Dick
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On 04/02/2014 11:58 AM, Dick Hollenbeck wrote:
> > >>>> Hi Jean-Samuel,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks very much for your willingness to help!
> > >>>>
> > >>>> In answer to your question:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The wxPython project manager sketch up should concentrate on
> the user interface,
> > not the
> > >>>> actual loading of the sub programs. In fact, if it did not
> load the subprograms
> > at all,
> > >>>> that would be acceptable. The screen real-estate usage, and
> the icons and
> > whatnot are
> > >>>> what's important for now. You could create scaffolding to mark
> a project and a
> > kiface as
> > >>>> being loaded, and test your UI code against that scaffolding,
> without ever
> > loading any
> > >>>> projects or opening any child frames.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> In milestone B) we are putting a top C++ API into the KIWAY,
> this is not designed
> > yet.
> > >>>> You should not use the KIFACE from python, that was never
> intended. Python will
> > use the
> > >>>> KIWAY API, which in turn will manage the KIFACE's and projects
> using C++.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> If you really really want to launch something, then encapsulate
> that python code into
> > >>>> something which will be replaced later, and simply load
> pcbnew.exe for now from that
> > >>>> disposable code. This code will get swapped out later, in
> favor of the KIWAY
> > API, which
> > >>>> will do the actuall loading of the *.kiface, again from C++.
> This is necessary
> > so that
> > >>>> the KIFACE to KIFACE
> > >> oops, meant not "KIFACE to KIFACE", but rather
> > >>
> > >> "project specific KIWAY_PLAYER to KIWAY_PLAYER"
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> comms can work for things like back annotation, and
> pcbnew<->eeschema
> > >>>> cross-probing, per project.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> There's actually little value in loading executables or
> kiface's right now.
> > Folks will
> > >>>> use the C++ project manager until the user interface in the
> python project manager is
> > >>>> superior. So please focus on the user interface, that's the
> value added stuff.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> After milestone B) that's when we start to worry about loading
> the submodules
> > (kifaces).
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Dick
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 04/02/2014 11:23 AM, Jean-Samuel Reynaud wrote:
> > >>>>> Hi
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> As I understand, one of the feature of this new interface is
> to load directly
> > from python
> > >>>>> the kiface interface (instead of just launch the program aka
> pcbnew/cvpcb for
> > example).
> > >>>>> Is it right ?
> > >>>>> As I see, the function KIFACE_1 return a struct with inside
> all function to use
> > (one of
> > >>>>> them is createwindow).
> > >>>>> Could you confirm it's the way you think about ?
> > >>>>> If yes, ctypes from python will help me and I think I'll fight
> with the structure
> > >>>>> definition inside python...
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Regards
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 2014-04-01 15:47 GMT+02:00 Dick Hollenbeck <dick@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:dick@xxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:dick@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> dick@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> In English there is a saying: "Competition breeds success."
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I would consider it a luxury to be able to choose [pieces]
> from multiple
> > implementations.
> > >>>>> Competition in this case is not exactly cruel and unusual
> punishment. In
> > fact it could
> > >>>>> be an *awful lot of fun*, since wxPython is such a high
> level language and
> > so much can be
> > >>>>> done in so few lines of code.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> You may either compete or collaborate. I think we'll get
> more ideas if
> > there is
> > >>>>> competition. After choices are made, you can continue to
> compete,
> > improving, innovating
> > >>>>> and serving your own needs, even if your code is not
> merged up to that point
> > in time.
> > >>>>> Repeat that last sentence.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Any implementation which does not meet the primary
> objective: "showing which
> > projects are
> > >>>>> open, among a larger set of project possibilities" will
> lose the
> > competition. (Even if
> > >>>>> there is only one entry into the competition, *multiple*
> open projects is a
> > mandate.)
> > >>>>> Using screen real estate for a permanently visible
> directory tree may not be
> > an optimal
> > >>>>> pathway to achieving the objective.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Some tips:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> a) the directory tree does not give sufficient emphasis on
> what constitutes
> > a project.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> b) the directory tree does not give the ability to show
> several open
> > projects without a
> > >>>>> sea of rows of actual files in between.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> c) we need to be more project centric, less file centric.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> d) once projects have been defined, the user interface
> procedure to opening
> > the schematic
> > >>>>> or layout tools on any of those projects needs to be lean.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> e) I'm thinking the set of files that constitute a project
> can continue to
> > reside in the
> > >>>>> *.pro file.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On 04/01/2014 07:24 AM, dileep kushwaha wrote:
> > >>>>> > Hi,
> > >>>>> > I have so far made the menubar for the wxPython. I
> now want to
> > integrate the
> > >>>>> > mainmenu.py to KiCAD instead of .cpp codes. I little
> hint and guidence
> > will be great. I
> > >>>>> > can send the code. Its ugly right now. i'll modify it
> according to
> > guidlines after
> > >>>>> > completing significant portion...(i see three .cpp files
> that will have to
> > changed)
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:14 AM, dileep kushwaha <
> dilzverykool@xxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:dilzverykool@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>>> <mailto:dilzverykool@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> dilzverykool@xxxxxxxxx>>
> > >>>>> > <mailto:dilzverykool@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> dilzverykool@xxxxxxxxx>
> > <mailto:dilzverykool@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:dilzverykool@xxxxxxxxx>>>>
> wrote:
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Hi,
> > >>>>> > Please accept my apology for the delay from my
> side. I can give
> > you few results
> > >>>>> > in maximum one week's time. I am able to make an
> exact replica of
> > KiCAD window
> > >>>>> that we
> > >>>>> > have right now. I was carried away and wanted the
> GUI to look pretty
> > innovative.
> > >>>>> I was
> > >>>>> > looking into the feasibility of an idea. The idea
> comes from a member who
> > >>>>> proposed it
> > >>>>> > to have a game like GUI. I was thinking if right
> click would give list
> > of options
> > >>>>> > surrounding it in circle. I think I will have to
> wait a little more to get
> > >>>>> expertise.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > I was shying away from showing my work. Apparently I
> will start
> > uploading on the
> > >>>>> > branch by evening 6PM IST(Indian Standard Time)
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Jean-Samuel Reynaud
> > <js.reynaud@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:js.reynaud@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>>> <mailto:js.reynaud@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:js.reynaud@xxxxxxxxx
> >>
> > >>>>> > <mailto:js.reynaud@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> js.reynaud@xxxxxxxxx>
> > <mailto:js.reynaud@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:js.reynaud@xxxxxxxxx>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > Ok I'm starting to work to meet window 1).
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > 2014-03-31 17:01 GMT+02:00 Dick Hollenbeck <
> dick@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:dick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>>> <mailto:dick@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dick@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
> > >>>>> > <mailto:dick@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:
> dick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > <mailto:dick@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dick@xxxxxxxxxxx>>>>:
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > On 03/24/2014 10:19 AM, Jean-Samuel Reynaud
> wrote:
> > >>>>> > > Hi,
> > >>>>> > >
> > >>>>> > > I can help too on this project. Tell me if
> you need more help.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> https://code.launchpad.net/~kicad-developers/kicad/prj-mgr
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > is still empty, so therefore I need help.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > There are two windows of opportunity here,
> with a middle
> > section where the
> > >>>>> > window is not open:
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > 1) Now, before I get to milestone C)
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > 2) Me doing milestone C), where collisions
> of effort are so
> > likely its most
> > >>>>> > sensible to
> > >>>>> > consider python contributions in this time
> un-helpful. Plus I
> > don't
> > >>>>> know what
> > >>>>> > I'll have
> > >>>>> > to work with at this point. And I won't be
> waiting for it.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > 3) After the C++ layer and framework are in
> place, then
> > collisions of effort
> > >>>>> > will not
> > >>>>> > concern me, the python project manager can
> and should be
> > expanded into a
> > >>>>> number of
> > >>>>> > directions, and I don't expect to play a
> role in that.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > I want to be clear about these two windows
> of opportunity, 1)
> > & 3), and the
> > >>>>> > approximate
> > >>>>> > timing, at least the sequencing.
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > The contributions that I would value most
> are in the window
> > described by 1).
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> > Mailing list:
> https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > >>>>> > Post to :
> kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>>> <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> > >>>>> > <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>>> <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
> > >>>>> > Unsubscribe:
> https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > >>>>> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> >
> > >>>>> > --
> > >>>>> > Dileep Kumar
> > >>>>> > M.Tech(VLSI Design)
> > >>>>> > Mob:9891455965
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > >>>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > >>>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > >>> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > >> Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > > Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > Post to : kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <mailto:kicad-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers
> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
> >
> >
>
>
Attachment:
unnamed.png
Description: PNG image
Follow ups
References
-
writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: dileep kushwaha, 2014-03-12
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-03-13
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: dileep kushwaha, 2014-03-24
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: dileep kushwaha, 2014-03-24
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Brian Sidebotham, 2014-03-24
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-03-24
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-03-24
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Jean-Samuel Reynaud, 2014-03-24
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-03-31
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Jean-Samuel Reynaud, 2014-03-31
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-04-01
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Jean-Samuel Reynaud, 2014-04-02
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-04-02
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-04-02
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-04-02
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Jean-Samuel Reynaud, 2014-04-03
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-04-04
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Carl Poirier, 2014-04-04
-
Re: writing a new top level wxPython based project manager
From: Dick Hollenbeck, 2014-04-04