kicad-developers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-developers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #35627
Re: Fwd: Re: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
2018-04-28 18:35 GMT+03:00 Wayne Stambaugh <stambaughw@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Just to be clear, the library developers are asking for the ability to
> ignore clearance and ratio settings when creating solder mask and solder
> paste only pads. If this is the case, it will require a board file format
> change to add a flag to ignore the global and footprint level settings. I
> would be opposed to changing the code to just assume that if it's a solder
> mask or solder paste only pad that no tolerance or ratio is applied. This
> would break an existing pads defined this way and silently change existing
> boards. Given that we are deep into feature freeze, the least painful
> solution would be to set the tolerance to 1nm and the ratio (as JP
> suggested) to 0.00001% for the footprints that need to maintain the
> dimensions of solder mask and solder paste only boards. The change to the
> overall pad dimensions using this method would be far below any board
> manufacturer's tolerance capabilities. Is this not an acceptable solution?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Wayne
>
>
Considering the requirements of compatibility with existing designs this is
acceptable. Maybe there could be a way to prevent unlucky situations where
a user hasn't understood the effects of the zero values. How about
something like this:
When the pad properties dialog is closed with OK, do this (in pseudocode):
IF no_copper_layers_in_pad THEN
IF abs(mask_clr) > 0.001mm OR
mask_clr == 0 OR
abs(paste_clr) > 0.001mm OR
paste_clr == 0 OR
abs(paste_rat) > 0.001 THEN
put_values = dialog_with_checkbox(
text = "Warning: non-copper pad sizes may be changed
uncontrollably because of clearance values."
checkbox_text = "Put safe values into clearance fields"
)
IF put_values THEN
change_clearance_fields_values_to_000001()
Experienced users could even exploit this to avoid writing the values
manually.
Eeli Kaikkonen
References
-
What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
From: Rene Pöschl, 2018-04-27
-
Re: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2018-04-27
-
Fwd: Re: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
From: Rene Pöschl, 2018-04-27
-
Re: Fwd: Re: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
From: Eeli Kaikkonen, 2018-04-27
-
Fwd: Re: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
From: jp charras, 2018-04-28
-
Re: Fwd: Re: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
From: Eeli Kaikkonen, 2018-04-28
-
Re: Fwd: Re: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
From: jp charras, 2018-04-28
-
Re: Fwd: Re: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
From: Strontium, 2018-04-28
-
Re: Fwd: Re: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
From: Rene Pöschl, 2018-04-28
-
Re: Fwd: Re: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
From: Eeli Kaikkonen, 2018-04-28
-
Re: Fwd: Re: What are the smallest values for pad paste and mask clearances? Why can't polygon pads not use negative mask clearance?
From: Wayne Stambaugh, 2018-04-28