openerp-community team mailing list archive
-
openerp-community team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #03695
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
-
To:
Olivier Dony <odo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Stefan Rijnhart <stefan@xxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:29:05 +0100
-
Cc:
openerp-community <openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
In-reply-to:
<CAP4GjTL-yNFsRLE9LHK3=tP1gfhsma+aLa8Zio14YACQiUB_Kg@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7
On 10/28/2013 08:30 PM, Olivier Dony wrote:
So it's very simple: if the OCB contributors find it useful to have a
faster commit path to the stable branches, then they might find that
respecting the stable policy somehow is worth it. It's an easy way to
give more power to the community.
Hi Olivier,
you do make it sound simple but like I asked Fabien earlier on in this
thread, would you be able to take all of the revisions if we kept the
small amount of schema-changing ones out? The answer of course is very
likely to be no, at least not all of them. That means that a two way
granularity on branch level (splitting up schema changers from the rest)
may good enough to base a semi-automated feedback process on.
Or what would be the process if you disagreed with a number of
ocb-specific changes that you encounter? Would we be required to
transfer them to the branch of rejects, then try again? It seems very
cumbersome for both sides.
Back at the community days I was thinking maybe we can come up with
something nifty and create a crazy bzr plugin to create
cryptographically signed revision taglets combined with replay so that
you could have a 'one bzr command' feedback proposal any time and if you
disagreed on anything either side could update the tags. But I'm not
sure if it's going to be less of a hassle than for you to simply
periodically look at what has been merged recently in OCB on Launchpad...
Sorry to sound a bit grumpy what with all your good spirits and
initiative in this matter! I am genuinly interested in what you, and
others, think of these obstacles.
So how do you plan to handle this? What will become of your 7.0
divergences once 8.0 is released?
We'll have to see what the ratio of divergence is, and then decide if we
want to split off some things that did not make it passed you guys in
separate modules if possible, and other things we might just try to get
passed you again ;-)
Cheers,
Stefan.
Follow ups
References