openerp-community team mailing list archive

Thread
Date

Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.

To: openerp-community@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: Stefan Rijnhart <stefan@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:37:19 +0100
In-reply-to: <526EC911.2020107@therp.nl>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7

On 10/28/2013 09:29 PM, Stefan Rijnhart wrote:

That means that a two way granularity on branch level (splitting upschema changers from the rest) may good enough to base asemi-automated feedback process on.


Oh, I mean

    may *not be* good enough

References

Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Nhomar Hernández, 2013-10-22
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Quentin THEURET, 2013-10-23
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-24
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Ronald Portier, 2013-10-24
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Fabien Pinckaers, 2013-10-25
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Olivier Dony, 2013-10-25
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan, 2013-10-25
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Joël Grand-Guillaume, 2013-10-28
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Olivier Dony, 2013-10-28
Re: Proposal to improve communication and make more efficient the inclusion of new branches.
From: Stefan Rijnhart, 2013-10-28