ubuntu-manual team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-manual team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04203
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
On 06/12/2013 08:33 AM, Yorvyk wrote:
> Is there any consensus on this yet?
Noone has said "no, don't use packaged texlive it breaks stuff" yet.
> From the mail thread (and my own quick test) it appears that the
> version in the repos. works for 13.04 and the upstream version will
> be needed for those that are running 12.04.
Correct. Well, 12.04 users could try backporting the 13.04 texlive
source packages instead. It could work, but seems more effort than it
is worth at this point :)
Jonathan
Follow ups
References
-
Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Patrick Dickey, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Tony Pursell, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Kevin Godby, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Tony Pursell, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Kevin Godby, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Kevin Godby, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Patrick Dickey, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Patrick Dickey, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Yorvyk, 2013-06-12