ubuntu-manual team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-manual team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04219
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
On 12 June 2013 12:32, Jonathan Marsden <jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Correct. Well, 12.04 users could try backporting the 13.04 texlive
> source packages instead. It could work, but seems more effort than it
> is worth at this point :)
Already done: https://launchpad.net/~texlive-backports/+archive/ppa
It shouldn't need much maintenance at this point but if somebody with
PPA experience wants to take over maintainership, let me know.
Jeremy
Follow ups
References
-
Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Patrick Dickey, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Tony Pursell, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Kevin Godby, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Tony Pursell, 2013-06-09
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Kevin Godby, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Kevin Godby, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Patrick Dickey, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Patrick Dickey, 2013-06-10
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Yorvyk, 2013-06-12
-
Re: Upstream vs packaged texlive
From: Jonathan Marsden, 2013-06-12