ubuntu-manual team mailing list archive

[Jonathan Marsden <jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Kevin,

On 06/28/2013 08:12 PM, Kevin Godby wrote:

>>   Version: 2013.20130530-1

> On May 30, 2013, though, the upstream TeX Live was still 2012. So that
> doesn't really clarify things much.
> 
> What does "pdflatex --version" print?

  pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013/Debian)
  kpathsea version 6.1.1
  Copyright 2013 Peter Breitenlohner (eTeX)/Han The Thanh (pdfTeX).
  There is NO warranty.  Redistribution of this software is
  covered by the terms of both the pdfTeX copyright and
  the Lesser GNU General Public License.
  For more information about these matters, see the file
  named COPYING and the pdfTeX source.
  Primary author of pdfTeX: Peter Breitenlohner (eTeX)/Han The Thanh
(pdfTeX).
  Compiled with libpng 1.2.49; using libpng 1.2.49
  Compiled with zlib 1.2.8; using zlib 1.2.8
  Compiled with poppler version 0.22.4

>> That, and removing the ttf-thai-tlwg font seems to be getting me
>> close to a working install process... 

> It's probably safe to remove that font package for now since (as far 
> as I know), no one is actively working on a Thai translation.

OK.  Now my modified install-pkgs.sh script runs to completion, but is
not installing two files that it looks for: rpsyr.tfm and rpzdr.tfm

Those two files are (or were) supposedly in the package
texlive-fonts-recommended -- but in Saucy Alpha-1 that is not the case.
 apt-file find says they do not exist in any package known to it in
Saucy.  Do you know if they have been removed from Texlive 2013?  In
which case, should I/we modify the install-pkgs.sh script not to look
for them any more?  How are they being used by Ubuntu Manual?  A grep
through the source tree does not find any references to them except in
the script.

Thanks,

Jonathan