← Back to team overview

ubuntu-manual team mailing list archive

Re: Installation of TexLive on Saucy alpha 1

 

On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Jonathan Marsden <jmarsden@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> What does "pdflatex --version" print?
>
>   pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013/Debian)
>   kpathsea version 6.1.1
>   Copyright 2013 Peter Breitenlohner (eTeX)/Han The Thanh (pdfTeX).
>   There is NO warranty.  Redistribution of this software is
>   covered by the terms of both the pdfTeX copyright and
>   the Lesser GNU General Public License.
>   For more information about these matters, see the file
>   named COPYING and the pdfTeX source.
>   Primary author of pdfTeX: Peter Breitenlohner (eTeX)/Han The Thanh
> (pdfTeX).
>   Compiled with libpng 1.2.49; using libpng 1.2.49
>   Compiled with zlib 1.2.8; using zlib 1.2.8
>   Compiled with poppler version 0.22.4

Cool. That looks pretty recent, then.  Here's what mine prints (from
upstream TL 2013):

$ pdflatex --version
pdfTeX 3.1415926-2.5-1.40.14 (TeX Live 2013)
kpathsea version 6.1.1
Copyright 2013 Peter Breitenlohner (eTeX)/Han The Thanh (pdfTeX).
There is NO warranty.  Redistribution of this software is
covered by the terms of both the pdfTeX copyright and
the Lesser GNU General Public License.
For more information about these matters, see the file
named COPYING and the pdfTeX source.
Primary author of pdfTeX: Peter Breitenlohner (eTeX)/Han The Thanh (pdfTeX).
Compiled with libpng 1.5.16; using libpng 1.5.16
Compiled with zlib 1.2.7; using zlib 1.2.7
Compiled with xpdf version 3.03


> OK.  Now my modified install-pkgs.sh script runs to completion, but is
> not installing two files that it looks for: rpsyr.tfm and rpzdr.tfm
>
> Those two files are (or were) supposedly in the package
> texlive-fonts-recommended -- but in Saucy Alpha-1 that is not the case.
>  apt-file find says they do not exist in any package known to it in
> Saucy.  Do you know if they have been removed from Texlive 2013?  In
> which case, should I/we modify the install-pkgs.sh script not to look
> for them any more?  How are they being used by Ubuntu Manual?  A grep
> through the source tree does not find any references to them except in
> the script.

Neither of those files appear in the upstream TL 2013 installation
either.  It appears they used to exist in TL 2009.  I think they were
the metrics for the Zapf Dingbat typeface. The closest I see in TL
2013 is pzdr.tfm and uzdr.tfm.

I'm guessing we no longer need those tfm files. As far as I know,
we're not using Zapf Dingbats in our manual.  (It's possible that we
were using it eons ago; I can't recall now.)

—Kevin


References