ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-phone team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #22268
Re: Canonical branded phone?
Hi
Since this thread went to all directions I would like to express my opinion
as well.
I think a Canonical branded phone would never happen. Canonical is a
software company.
I don't think UT is dead either. It is because ubuntu phones are repurposed
android phones so OEMs don't need to invest a lot. They have some devices
left in stock the can just sell them as ubuntu phones.
I aslo believe is the Canonical who don't want new devices until the UT
moves to snappy and to 16 series. This transition is not simply (it needs
systemd, newer kernel). So until there are devices with the required kernel
Canonical is working on their part of the transition.
--
Sent using Dekko from my Ubuntu device
Follow ups
References
-
Canonical branded phone?
From: Krzysztof Tataradziński, 2016-09-05
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Art, 2016-09-07
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: mark, 2016-09-07
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Mitchell Reese, 2016-09-07
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: mark, 2016-09-08
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2016-09-11
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Mathijs Veen, 2016-09-11
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Bob Summerwill, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Mathijs Veen, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Mitchell Reese, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Mathijs Veen, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Eran Benjamin, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: mail, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Eric Holmi, 2016-09-13
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Seth Ciango, 2016-09-13