ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-phone team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #22271
Re: Canonical branded phone?
Hi,
also from the silent majority :)
1) there is no ubuntu laptop neither, so dont really expect ubuntu phone
either.
2) the developement/improvement of phones are slowing down dramatically,
like for computers. Thus it is more then possible that our current phone
will stay with us for next 5 years (or until dies but more then possible
that we can buy the same phone). Meizu pro5 is quite a good phone, first i
tought it's big indeed but reading websites its needed. Now im fully got
used to it. (I also flashed it because in China there was no other option
from the beginning. It was easy and I've learned a lot along the way.)
3) this project as i see is a long term investment (so stays anyway) as
google is trying to come for desktop and ubuntu is going for hand devices
I also wish to contribute, but as working for a startup it's currently
impossible, but hopefully it will change (that's why i've started anyway).
But basically for me the ubuntu phone already replaced the android.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Nikos Chatziioakimidis <
nchatziioakimidis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Since this thread went to all directions I would like to express my
> opinion as well.
>
> I think a Canonical branded phone would never happen. Canonical is a
> software company.
>
> I don't think UT is dead either. It is because ubuntu phones are
> repurposed android phones so OEMs don't need to invest a lot. They have
> some devices left in stock the can just sell them as ubuntu phones.
>
> I aslo believe is the Canonical who don't want new devices until the UT
> moves to snappy and to 16 series. This transition is not simply (it needs
> systemd, newer kernel). So until there are devices with the required kernel
> Canonical is working on their part of the transition.
>
>
> --
> Sent using Dekko from my Ubuntu device
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> Post to : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups
References
-
Canonical branded phone?
From: Krzysztof Tataradziński, 2016-09-05
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Art, 2016-09-07
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: mark, 2016-09-07
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Mitchell Reese, 2016-09-07
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: mark, 2016-09-08
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2016-09-11
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Mathijs Veen, 2016-09-11
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Bob Summerwill, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Mathijs Veen, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Mitchell Reese, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Mathijs Veen, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Eran Benjamin, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: mail, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Eric Holmi, 2016-09-13
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Seth Ciango, 2016-09-13
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Nikos Chatziioakimidis, 2016-09-13