ubuntu-phone team mailing list archive
-
ubuntu-phone team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #22291
Re: Canonical branded phone?
I think I read somewhere that there were internal bugs at launchpad visible
only to canonical members... Even if I didn't read that it's not hard to
imagine.
Isn't it possible that they just moved the pre-release device images to a
private server?
If I made Canonical sign NDAs and suddenly I found myself reading posts
about my secret next project I would ask them to wipe out any source of
information leakage to comply with the signed NDAs...
Of course the code can still be a source of leakages, but they could also
have a private branch for this specific development... that needs to be
merged later into the main branch.
I also noted that the Final validation process of OTAs got longer since the
last OTA... could be associated to possible new devices under test?
Just crazy ideas that came to my head...
Best Regards,
Felipe.
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Nikos Chatziioakimidis <
nchatziioakimidis@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Τετάρτη, 14 Σεπτεμβρίου 2016 10:36:17 Π.Μ. EEST, Matthias Apitz <
> guru@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> What I do miss in all this thread, is some statement from BQ about the
>> future devices with Ubuntu as OS, like the existing E4.5 and M10, ...
>> Or have I overlooked this somehow?
>> Thanks
>>
>> matthias
>>
>
> There is not an official statement but there are no ubuntu phones on the
> market anymore. Plus the images for the "midori” device was pulled from the
> image - server.
>
>
> --
> Sent using Dekko from my Ubuntu device
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> Post to : ubuntu-phone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
References
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Mitchell Reese, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Mathijs Veen, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Eran Benjamin, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: mail, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Jo-Erlend Schinstad, 2016-09-12
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Eric Holmi, 2016-09-13
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Seth Ciango, 2016-09-13
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Nikos Chatziioakimidis, 2016-09-13
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Radics Geza, 2016-09-14
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Ivo Fernandes, 2016-09-14
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Matthias Apitz, 2016-09-14
-
Re: Canonical branded phone?
From: Nikos Chatziioakimidis, 2016-09-14