unity-design team mailing list archive

[Ryan Gauger <rtgkid@xxxxxxxxx>]

But I do not see how it is a burden to developers. Why not just leave it as it was? I just don't understand the burden part. Someone please explain it to me. Thanks!!!

In Christ,
Ryan

Sent from my iPod

On May 3, 2012, at 3:00 PM, Conscious User <conscioususer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Em 03-05-2012 13:46, Ryan Gauger escreveu:
>> 
>> No, I think the vast majority of users upgrade every release, not just Long-Term Support releases. I would rather have a simple option in CCSM than have to get special packages from the web, then from there unpack them... Again, I think an option would not be a problem. Unity needs to be more customisable, not less, which is what we are doing here by removing options. Thanks!
> 
> You have been told more than once that part of the problem is 
> the burden on developers, yet you never addressed that.
> 
> If you insist on ignoring this argument, you give the impression
> that you don't care how burdened the developers are, which is
> a disrespect to them.
> 
> -- 
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~unity-design
> Post to     : unity-design@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~unity-design
> More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp