yade-users team mailing list archive
-
yade-users team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02893
Re: TranslationEngine Vs JumpChangeSe3
Yes Bruno, this would be lovely (and perhaps simple to do). Can we
(you) do that? Do we already have a sort of DOFs for velocities
exactly as for generalized displacements?
Apparently, it is already implemented that way. NewtonIntegrator.cpp:182 :
blockTranslateDOFs(state->blockedDOFs, state->accel);
state->vel+=dt*state->accel;
The first line is not maintaining constant position but null acceleration.
So, the body will move at constant velocity.
Bruno
References
-
TranslationEngine Vs JumpChangeSe3
From: chiara modenese, 2010-04-19
-
Re: TranslationEngine Vs JumpChangeSe3
From: chiara modenese, 2010-04-19
-
Re: TranslationEngine Vs JumpChangeSe3
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2010-04-19
-
Re: TranslationEngine Vs JumpChangeSe3
From: chiara modenese, 2010-04-23
-
Re: TranslationEngine Vs JumpChangeSe3
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2010-04-23
-
Re: TranslationEngine Vs JumpChangeSe3
From: chiara modenese, 2010-04-23
-
Re: TranslationEngine Vs JumpChangeSe3
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2010-04-23
-
Re: TranslationEngine Vs JumpChangeSe3
From: chiara modenese, 2010-04-23
-
Re: TranslationEngine Vs JumpChangeSe3
From: Václav Šmilauer, 2010-04-23
-
Re: TranslationEngine Vs JumpChangeSe3
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2010-04-23
-
Re: TranslationEngine Vs JumpChangeSe3
From: chiara modenese, 2010-04-23