yade-users team mailing list archive
-
yade-users team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #02984
Re: Energy dissipation + radius of fictious "box" sphere is now =r (not 2*r)
Ok, but this means that if one wants to calculate the total energy of
the system (e.g. to check whether it is conservative or not) cannot
make the sum of the potential energy and the kinetic one as it is now
defined, right?
Yes. If you have systems where kinetic energy is not negligeable
compared to other terms you have to interpolate velocities as
v(t-dt/2)+acceleration*dt/2.
Check the comparison in attached file for a 1D mass-spring system.
In my case, I always found negligible kinetic energy in triaxial tests,
so I didn't really care about the dt/2 thing.
Bruno
Attachment:
energy.ods
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet
References
-
Energy dissipation
From: chiara modenese, 2010-04-20
-
Re: Energy dissipation
From: chiara modenese, 2010-04-21
-
Re: Energy dissipation
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2010-04-21
-
Re: Energy dissipation
From: chiara modenese, 2010-04-21
-
Re: Energy dissipation + radius of fictious "box" sphere is now =r (not 2*r)
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2010-04-21
-
Re: Energy dissipation + radius of fictious "box" sphere is now =r (not 2*r)
From: chiara modenese, 2010-05-03
-
Re: Energy dissipation + radius of fictious "box" sphere is now =r (not 2*r)
From: chiara modenese, 2010-05-04
-
Re: Energy dissipation + radius of fictious "box" sphere is now =r (not 2*r)
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2010-05-05
-
Re: Energy dissipation + radius of fictious "box" sphere is now =r (not 2*r)
From: chiara modenese, 2010-05-05
-
Re: Energy dissipation + radius of fictious "box" sphere is now =r (not 2*r)
From: Bruno Chareyre, 2010-05-05
-
Re: Energy dissipation + radius of fictious "box" sphere is now =r (not 2*r)
From: chiara modenese, 2010-05-05