kicad-lib-committers team mailing list archive
-
kicad-lib-committers team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #00102
Re: Fwd: Re: About library naming conventions
Hi Kerusey,
In order to reach more people, I restarted the conversation on the
developer's mailing list. I will reply there.
Carl
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 1:43 AM, Kerusey Karyu <keruseykaryu@xxxxx> wrote:
> W dniu 06.04.2014 01:55, Carl Poirier pisze:
>
>
>> At this point, we shall to ask: How many users use SI units when
>> drawing schematics? Most of them will look at grid only and doesn't
>> care about mm or inches.
>> Units of measurement are important, but where they are actually
>> required to maintain strict dimensions.
>>
>>
>> If you look at the metrication of the world, you will notice people
>> using the imperial system are getting scarce these days.
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SI-metrication-world.png
>>
>> IMHO this picture isn't an argument here.
>
>
>
> If we force 4mm or 2.5mm of pin length these pins will be outside of
>> the grid when somebody uses inches. IMO this is not the way we
>> should follow.
>>
>>
>> Same can be said when one uses the SI system to draw his schematic.
>>
>> If he only switch from inches to mm using Eeschema left toolbar nothing
> will happen. The grid remains the same.
>
> As I said before, I'm using grid points for reference and don't care about
> current units when draw a schematic. And I'm sure that many people do the
> same.
> For me the grid in inches is better because it's easier to multiply simple
> numbers like 0.05" than 1.27mm.
>
>
>
> (...) unless the manufacturer places the components in a different
>> orientation in tubes, tapes or trays (Important for P&P).
>>
>>
>> Good point. Can you tell me, for a device that's made by many
>> manufacturers and sold in such packages, do they all use the same
>> orientation?
>>
>> http://www.ti.com/lit/an/szza021c/szza021c.pdf
> A very interesting table on pages 12-14. One manufacturer and different
> pin 1 location in tape, even for the same packages. For example package
> widely known as SC-70-5: DCK3 pin 1 on lower left quadrant, DCK2
> pin 1 on upper right quadrant.
>
>
>
> Regards
> Kerusey Karyu
>
>
> --
> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers
> Post to : kicad-lib-committers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-lib-committers
> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
>
Follow ups
References
-
Fwd: Re: About library naming conventions
From: Kerusey Karyu, 2014-02-25
-
Re: Fwd: Re: About library naming conventions
From: Carl Poirier, 2014-02-25
-
Re: Fwd: Re: About library naming conventions
From: Kerusey Karyu, 2014-02-26
-
Re: Fwd: Re: About library naming conventions
From: Vesa Solonen, 2014-02-26
-
Re: Fwd: Re: About library naming conventions
From: Carl Poirier, 2014-03-10
-
Re: Fwd: Re: About library naming conventions
From: John Beard, 2014-03-10
-
Re: Fwd: Re: About library naming conventions
From: Carl Poirier, 2014-03-20
-
Re: Fwd: Re: About library naming conventions
From: Carl Poirier, 2014-03-20
-
Re: Fwd: Re: About library naming conventions
From: Carl Poirier, 2014-03-23
-
Re: Fwd: Re: About library naming conventions
From: Kerusey Karyu, 2014-03-24
-
Re: Fwd: Re: About library naming conventions
From: Carl Poirier, 2014-03-24
-
Re: Fwd: Re: About library naming conventions
From: Kerusey Karyu, 2014-03-25
-
Re: Fwd: Re: About library naming conventions
From: Carl Poirier, 2014-04-03
-
Re: Fwd: Re: About library naming conventions
From: Kerusey Karyu, 2014-04-05
-
Re: Fwd: Re: About library naming conventions
From: Carl Poirier, 2014-04-05
-
Re: Fwd: Re: About library naming conventions
From: Kerusey Karyu, 2014-04-19