lubuntu-qa team mailing list archive
-
lubuntu-qa team
-
Mailing list archive
-
Message #04994
Re: Alternate testcase changes
-
To:
Lubuntu QA <lubuntu-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
From:
Lars Noodén <lars.nooden@xxxxxxxxx>
-
Date:
Fri, 27 Feb 2015 21:06:16 +0200
-
In-reply-to:
<CAFe_ewhC7J9VhTJ4o16SSq7YV4L5=cKf_pziFPgE0KYNNuDZ_g@mail.gmail.com>
-
User-agent:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
On 27.02.2015 20:36, Walter Lapchynski wrote:
>...
> If you do want to help with testcases, I emphasize how important it is
> to make sure that we have matching testcases for both desktop and
> alternate. Please make sure to read the documentation on styles and
> such. A hint on that: there's no such thing as a "Lubuntu" testcase.
>
> [1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1425681/comments/10
> [2]: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-testcase/ubuntu-manual-tests/trunk/view/head:/testcases/image/1439_Alternate%20Install%20%28Encryption%29
>From that perspective I would say that it is important to add an
encrypted HD test to the Desktop image rather than trim it from the
Alternate image. I don't have a bureaucratic bone in my body and very
limited skills otherwise, but within those constraints I can try to help
write up the test cases. I can see we could checkout and edit [2]
above, but the contents seem fine. Is it just a matter of creating a
file, say, "1659_Install (encryption)" and filling it with the steps
need to get Ubiquity to create an encrypted LVM?
Regards,
/Lars
Follow ups
References