p2psp team mailing list archive

[Ilshat Shakirov <im.shakirov@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hello!,

I found problem in the concept of simulation =)
The malicious peer connects to the team after some delay and it's a
problem. Because of that, i.e. with parameters N=9, T=6, A=3, splitter will
give the peer list with first trusted peers for attackers. And the result
will be 3. But expected is 3.4. And this is why the expected differs from
result.
I will fix it soon, and update the sheet. I think after this update the
DIFF rows must become equal to 0.00 =)

Thanks for feedback!

2015-04-03 3:49 GMT+06:00 Vicente Gonzalez <vicente.gonzalez.ruiz@xxxxxxxxx>
:

>
>
> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:19 AM Ilshat Shakirov <im.shakirov@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello!,
>>
>
> Hello
>
>
>>
>> I began fill the results to table -
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pc6yb87xJy8gNkWSWvvCvjAjR6WBFdOzCbPvO-zEooU/edit#gid=506203193
>> (result3 tab)
>> I think formula works, but Im a little bit confused about diifs 0,1-0,12.
>> May be it's some bugs in stat gatherer module of simulator, maybe there
>> some mistake with formula.
>>
>> Soon, I will prepare scripts for running simulation without ide. And I
>> will attach log files (with each peer' buffers) to experiments.
>>
>> What do you think? =)
>>
>
> Sorry, I don't know is there is a mistake somewhere (in any case, results
> are quite good). But I have a question. Does DIFF decrease with the number
> of experiments?
>
> Best,
> Vi.
>