ubuntu-bugcontrol team mailing list archive

[Alberto Salvia Novella <es20490446e@xxxxxxxxx>]

David Alan Gilbert:
> Note that the existing criteria give you other criteria; so for
> example 'low' says it's for bugs with an easy workaround.
>
> Now, I wouldn't generally knock something that caused a 'won't boot'
> or problem with a critical device down to low because it's got
> an easy work around, but I might knock it down one level.

While this in theory sounds logic; in practice I never had to use those 
criteria, because something else weighed more.

For example, my computer suddenly stopped working after an upgrade. The 
work-around was simply to configure GRUB to boot with a previous kernel, 
but because at least 80% of people would require technical support for 
doing so I decided to set it as critical.

So what I think is leaving specific cases for intuition rather to policy 
will make the latest leaner.


5S methodology:
> Remove all parts not in use. If in doubt about anything, discard it.

5S methodology:
> At first, it may be difficult to distinguish between what is
> necessary and what is not.
> In the beginning, get rid of items in the station work can be
> disturbing.
> People tend to surround themselves with pieces, thinking may be
> necessary for "following orders". Come a machine that is
> inappropriate and think that, anyway, will later be useful for
> something.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature